I agree with much of that.
And the guy in the video is essentially channeling what I've been saying for quite awhile now. It's why I predicted that the iPod and iPhone would trounce other tech... Jobs understood convergence better than almost anyone in the modern era.
People forget how onerous the process was to buy music or to install an application. And does anyone remember the early days of Android where the market was ridiculously fragmented based on silly sounding Android OS names? The average person just wasn't interested in mastering or even participating in that learning curve. It's why for a long time, there were lines outside Apple stores for products. They understood convergence. Now, I like Tim Cook, but he understands it less so and the last few years have been Apple becoming big at the expense of the future and they are coming dangerously close to Kodak territory. I see a market disruption coming in that space, too.
As for solar, I have mixed feelings on it. I think it will be part of the energy matrix, but not dominant.
I just saw a video, a TEDtalk from a Mennonite, pacifist, anti-nuclear activist that there's a groundswell among hardcore climate activists that Thorium fueled nuclear is the way to go even over solar and hydro. That people like him as well as Jim Hanson (I think I got his name right, he's the scientist who was among the earliest to talk about man-made climate change) are advocating for Thorium fueled nuclear is really something and, quite honestly, based on the data, it's hard to argue with him.
I do take umbrage with his lack of concern for waste, even as he acknowledges that it's the only energy that we capture the waste (we don't capture the sulfur, methane and CO2 that are generated from coal and natural gas). I mean, in real terms, we have a "Captain Philips" and Somali pirates raiding ocean vessels expressly because the French dumped their nuclear waste off of the coast of Somalia and the leaking containers decimated the fishing. The fishermen literally had nothing else they could do other than become drones for the local warlords. So waste (including the reconditioning of the waste as we only use about 3% of the fuel prior to storing it) and the entire use process of nuclear fuel has to be revisited... again without the dogma. That said, I'm glad they aren't putting up the Uranium fueled plant here in Florida.
I have a more complete take on how nuclear could work and significantly more safe than currently deployed, but I'll save that for another post if anyone's interested. Anyway, here's the video. And for X, it's only 16 mins long, iirc.