- Joined
- Nov 9, 2014
- Messages
- 13,115
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/803e0/803e0481b8c300d6e7fcd4d964e9438ac8abc1a4" alt="Mood: A1 LA5"
FIFYI don't think any Rams Fan would have been happy at just a 2nd round pick for Stafford
They wanted a second this year and first next year. Bonsignore said the Raiders weren’t going to give up their first rounder this year.I don't think anyone would have been happy at just a 2nd round pick for Stafford
As for possibility of still taking one of these top 5 QBs... interesting video on those guys.
Cosell sees the same thing many of us seem to like in Dart. He thinks he could develop into something. I know Jeremiah compares him to Hurts... needs more development, but could be a good player in time. Cosell feels the same.
View: https://youtu.be/BvPAn75P9z0?si=9nGhmIcumZTLKB8j
I think we should have autocorrect change Florio to Foolio. What say you @CGI_Ram ?Florio is such a douche
Figured you would have taken care of that already.I think we should have autocorrect change Florio to Foolio. What say you @CGI_Ram ?
Not astonished?I heard a top insider (Schefter?) also suggest a one-year deal but that would surprise, shock me.
I might be Astounded! Possibly even Flabbergasted!!!
Yeah but some of those 'pet theories' were awful takes.
I saw that tweet. It would have been nice if he said that's what the Rams asked. But, it could be interpreted as to what he thought would have gotten the deal done if Stafford didn't want to stay in LA.They wanted a second this year and first next year. Bonsignore said the Raiders weren’t going to give up their first rounder this year.
We don’t know if the first next year would have happened.
Damn! I KNEW someone would ask that!Figured you would have taken care of that already.
![]()
I posted it on the previous page. He said this years second and next years first would have gotten it done. So, I take it that is what theRams wanted and if the Raiders weren’t willing to give that much up, then the Rams would have traded him.I saw that tweet. It would have been nice if he said that's what the Rams asked. But, it could be interpreted as to what he thought would have gotten the deal done if Stafford didn't want to stay in LA.
Yeah I saw it on twitter or X or whatever. He was catching some heat regarding his earlier reporting on how close things were to being completed. He had also said that things would look different if the Raiders were willing to give up the #6 overall selection.I posted it on the previous page. He said this years second and next years first would have gotten it done. So, I take it that is what theRams wanted and if the Raiders weren’t willing to give that much up, then the Rams would have traded him.
It's been widely reported that the Rams were looking for 1st round value.Yeah I saw it on twitter or X or whatever. He was catching some heat regarding his earlier reporting on how close things were to being completed. He had also said that things would look different if the Raiders were willing to give up the #6 overall selection.
Via the trade chart a 2025 2nd rounder and 2026 2nd rounder would equal 1st round value, too. So would a 2025 2nd & 3rd round selection. The former would just be a higher 1st round selection.It's been widely reported that the Rams were looking for 1st round value.
Future picks are typically discounted by a round, so a 2025 2nd plus a 2026 1st would be 1st round value. I doubt the Rams were just asking for a 2nd.
Via the trade chart a 2025 2nd rounder and 2026 2nd rounder would equal 1st round value, too. So would a 2025 2nd & 3rd round selection. The former would just be a higher 1st round selection.
Yes, both of those would be 1st round value. The Raiders 2nd (37) and 3rd (68) would be late 1st round value at approx. pick 22. Depening on how much you discount the fuutre pick - a half round vs a full round - the package with the 2026 2nd would be worth anywhere from pick 21 to 25.Via the trade chart a 2025 2nd rounder and 2026 2nd rounder would equal 1st round value, too. So would a 2025 2nd & 3rd round selection. The former would just be a higher 1st round selection.
We'll never know what might have happened if the Raiders or Giants offered their #1. I'm just grateful that they didnt and we are so back.I honestly don't believe that the Rams and Snead ever intended to trade Stafford, this whole act was just used for negotiating purposes. let us not forget as Rams fans, "In Snead We Trust".
Agreed. I value this year's shot at another title far more than the pick options higher in this draft. Very glad we retained the soul taker. Build that defense into an elite range this offseason and Stafford will take care of the rest.We'll never know what might have happened if the Raiders or Giants offered their #1. I'm just grateful that they didnt and we are so back.
Staff and AJ back and ready to kick some ass