- Joined
- Jun 24, 2010
- Messages
- 35,254
- Name
- Stu
To me it was more about angles. Cooks is running forward and appeared to lower his helmet to avoid a direct hit while the defender launched with his head. To me, that’s a clear violation.The only thing about the head shot on Cooks is that Cooks head lowered more than the defenders head. I don't think it was anything more than a continuation play of these two players movements and could argue Cooks actually lowered his head into the other guys head. So I don't think it should have warranted an ejection but at the same time, there absolutely should have been a helmet to helmet penalty thrown in there. You just can't ignore that.
We haven't heard the last on this play. That's for sure.
Question I have....can replay be the catylist for an ejection? A flag? I seriously doubt the NFL would want to open up that can and allow penalties based on new views from replay, but replay influencing elections wouldn't be criminal to me.
As to not wanting to allow replay to decide that, college does it and it seems to work better than what we’re seeing in the NFL. I don’t see any reason NOT to.