Yeah, except I've been down on some of these moves a lot longer than the last few days. Go join the other one in the corner.
Fact is and will remain we didn't *need* a Ramsey, we overpaid (at best, 1 1st and maybe a 4th should have been sent), and we had a lot bigger holes to fill than replacing one expensive corner with another one. Just this year alone, we've given up the number 20 pick in a draft that's pretty offensive line deep with plug-and-play 1st year starters in the 1st round (that pick could have been a Josh Jones, an Isaiah Wilson or an Andrew Thomas) and has some interesting linebackers at the top (could have pivoted and gone for a Patrick Queen or a Kenneth Murray) that would have filled a way bigger hole than CB. And we'd have them on the cheap for 5 years. Next year, we're very likely giving up a pick in the 9-12 range, which means a blue chip prospect.
I see people here talking about how the sack numbers went up after he arrived. Yeah, that tends to happen when you start off facing teams with generally solid offensive lines and then on the back end get teams like Arizona twice, a wounded Pittsburgh team that was getting run over by everybody, the Bungles and their terribad line, etc. I would certainly hope the numbers against those teams would be higher than they were against contenders with strong lines.
People here love to de-value 1st round picks under the guise that "guys outside the top 10 rarely turn into anything anyways", and then completely go against their own logic by obsessing over how many 3rd and 4th round compensatory picks the team gets or talking up these mid round dudes the team has that haven't proven anything like they're all gonna be stars. Fact is, in the 3rd round, there's very likely 1 superstar in there, 3, MAYBE 4 dudes who turn into rock solid starters, and a lot of situational cats. That's where you go to complete a team and load it with depth, not where you go to fill giant gaping holes on both sides of the ball.