It's cute how you try to anoint yourself the arbiter of what can be discussed or not, or on what terms. I hate to shatter the mirror for you, but that's not how the internet works.
Fact of the matter is, it was a controversial move when it was made, it looks like a terrible move now given how it's put the team's back against the wall, and questioning each and every facet of that move is on the table. Given that you didn't take me up on my challenge, I'm going to go ahead and assume you don't have nearly the vested financial interest in the team's well being that I have, which puts you on hind foot there, as well.
Reality is, we didn't need to make that move last year. The way Peters did a 180 the moment he landed in Baltimore shows that we already had the talent back there, the issue was coaching and scheming. And even if we did want to make that move, we were the only bidders for Ramsey and overpaid. And even if Jacksonville tried to hang on, we could have gotten on-par talent for much less (see what the Steelers gave up for Fitzpatrick - a different position, sure, but we could have gotten him for a lot less than Ramsey, kept Peters, and been better off (especially since Weddle retired). There were a couple other corners we could have run at too, if we were really so desperate for that - none of whom would have cost 2 1st rounders and the potential of having to tag at the end of this season. On top of ALL that, secondary wasn't even our biggest problem on that side of the ball - linebacker was. And is now a glaring f'ing hole this year with our FA losses.