SNF: Vikings at Seahawks
- Thread starter CGI_Ram
- Start date
-
To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.
One yard. That is all the vikes needed to win. I agree with zimmer. Obviously their defense could bot hold. So even in retrospcet zimmer was right
Such a poorly executed play. If they were hell bent on going for it on 4th and inches, run a QB sneak. Instead you give it to a backup RB who runs right into his blocker.
It was the WRONG call. Even if Seattle marches down the field, which was predictable, they have to make the two point conversion which is maybe a 50-50 crap shoot. And even then, if they make it, it's just overtime, not a win.
and so what? That is. Impossible? Hell. it was harder for the. Hawks to get the tr in the first place. Your logc bascally says its east to move the ball 80 yards for a td in 90 seconds but impossible to score a. 2 pt conversion
Russel seemed really sped up in that post game interview....seaderall seahawks back again??
Zimmer is terrible. You kick.the fg there. Then you blitz on every play and don't lay a hand on Wilson..
Just terrible
Just terrible
“Turbo set!”
Pro Bowler
Why did Collinsworth say the math or whatever says it was right to go for it?
I'm pissed off because Zimmer cost us a tie for first in the NFC West.
Really can't stand the dude, he's an arrogant sob.
Because he's a Seahags fan? And no, the lack of blue font is not an accident.
The way Wilson plays reminds me of the buttcheese madden players who run backwards and throw moon balls on hail marys over and over again while you're trying to play the game with some realism
I liked the call to go for it on 4th down. What I didn't like is the Vikes defense letting Seattle drive 95 yards with less than 2 minutes. The Vikes defense lost that game...not Zimmerman!
This is a good example of how the "math," if it said to go for it, can be wrong. Statistics on how often you can convert a short 4th down can't address the actual game context of a play, or the consequences of not making it.
Exactly. Plus the chart they showed didn't have making the fg...its a 8 pt. Game if you make it. Your kicker can't make an extra point in the rain?
No, it says that the consequences of not making the 4th down could be losing the game. The consequences of kicking the field goal are, at worst, a tie in regulation.