One yard. That is all the vikes needed to win. I agree with zimmer. Obviously their defense could bot hold. So even in retrospcet zimmer was rightWell was going off the fact they failed the 2 point conversion. But worst case scenario it goes to OT instead of losing the game. Don't get me started on the all out blitzes they decided to do that whole series after.
Such a poorly executed play. If they were hell bent on going for it on 4th and inches, run a QB sneak. Instead you give it to a backup RB who runs right into his blocker.Viking RB just had to pop outside on that 4th down run and he would have been in the end zone. The dumbass basically ran right into the Seattle defender.
So you ass7me a 2 pt conversion is unlikely.?Which is why you kick a field goal. Makes it an 8 point game.
Nah. Zimmer made right call. His defense was not going to hold
and so what? That is. Impossible? Hell. it was harder for the. Hawks to get the tr in the first place. Your logc bascally says its east to move the ball 80 yards for a td in 90 seconds but impossible to score a. 2 pt conversionIt was the WRONG call. Even if Seattle marches down the field, which was predictable, they have to make the two point conversion which is maybe a 50-50 crap shoot. And then it's overtime, not a win
Vikings fans have to be losing their minds. Unreal!
Why did Collinsworth say the math or whatever says it was right to go for it?
Why did Collinsworth say the math or whatever says it was right to go for it?
Why did Collinsworth say the math or whatever says it was right to go for it?
and so what? That is. Impossible? Hell. it was harder for the. Hawks to get the tr in the first place. Your logc bascally says its east to move the ball 80 yards for a td in 90 seconds but impossible to score a. 2 pt conversion