- Joined
- Jan 6, 2014
- Messages
- 1,741
- Name
- B and G
Yeah, that bugged me. McLeod was perfectly within his rights to bump the receiver out of the way (uh, inadvertently) in an attempt to get the ball. He should have run right through the receiver since his eyes were locked on it.
Anyone remember 3 flies up? Cloud would have sucked at that game. Bigger receiver, smaller defender, it pissed me off too, but I'll give them that one.Yeah, that bugged me. McLeod was perfectly within his rights to bump the receiver out of the way (uh, inadvertently) in an attempt to get the ball. He should have run right through the receiver since his eyes were locked on it.
Yeah, that bugged me. McLeod was perfectly within his rights to bump the receiver out of the way (uh, inadvertently) in an attempt to get the ball. He should have run right through the receiver since his eyes were locked on it.
Yep. That, and tennis-ball home run derby.Anyone remember 3 flies up?
Counter boot reverse responsibility.OK, I'm probably going to expose my ignorance (though to pre-empt smartaleckness, that will be the only thing exposed), but what is CBR?
I doubt it's the site Comic Book Resources, which is the only CBR I know...
Counter, cutback.Cutback, boot, reverse . . .
I think he'll get his chance.Was so frustrated with McLeod on this play, but hey, that's why I want the more athletic Joyner at free safety. It is what it is.
I think he'll get his chance.
Counter, cutback.
You say Potato, and I say nom nom nom.
Yeah, that bugged me. McLeod was perfectly within his rights to bump the receiver out of the way (uh, inadvertently) in an attempt to get the ball. He should have run right through the receiver since his eyes were locked on it.
'Was one of those plays that made me wonder if "this was going to be the Giants day".
''
How about the ONLY play that we gt pressure on Eli, he bailed out, running as fast as he could backwards, tried to throw it away, and his TE made an unbelievable catch. I thought, "crap".
No offense, but he (X) knows the difference, he was just making a joke. I, too, like you posting these. Keep it up.Counter would have a specific blocking scheme and would should be recognizable, cutbacks are on plays that have multiple hole options, whereas coutner has pulling OLmen and more localized hole design. Small, but recognizable differences with counter versus cutback in rams scheme, IMO
Right. I didn't know what you thought, or were saying, Long's responsibility was on that play formation on that other play you posted where the QB stayed in the box. He's the CBR player on runs away and force player on runs that flow to him. Looked like (again, in that other play), while the motion receiver was coming down his side, he was still responsible for the counter on the play-fake to the RB. Or maybe not. Are we certain we know what his responsibility really was there? As it pertains to the picture in this thread, he might have contain, but he also might have to crash the C gap on a counter read, no? I mean, it was a play-fake and I don't know if anyone expects Manning to roll out (or line up wide like earlier.... wtf was that?).Counter would have a specific blocking scheme and would should be recognizable, cutbacks are on plays that have multiple hole options, whereas coutner has pulling OLmen and more localized hole design. Small, but recognizable differences with counter versus cutback in rams scheme, IMO