I like Rams
Hall of Fame
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2017
- Messages
- 2,258
Yeah, i still see Jefferson as having more trade value because he is cheap and from the Rams side no real dead money. And he kind of disappeared in the last few games when it mattered.A bu ch of talking heads speculating and an unnamed NFL source
BFD
You guys are getting ahead of yourselves giving this any credibility.
First question what is the dead money if he is moved?
reality is him and Stafford lacked chemistry and we won without him so the non emotional decision is easy.
But damn it’s gonna hurt if/when he goes.
They likely would trade one away first as they have a good WR corp.Woods to the Vikings makes a lot of sense. O'Connell wants to bring a great culture to Minnesota. Woods knows his system and would be a great mentor to Justin Jefferson and certainly help Cousin's.
I'm a bit torn...
Surely we can afford an EDGE and CB along with keeping Woods?
After the Super Bowl and thinking back on the season, I'm VERY down on Van Jefferson. I think he's a JAG with some speed and offers nothing else. I'd rather just not re-sign OBJ and keep Woods I think.
I'm a bit torn...
Surely we can afford an EDGE and CB along with keeping Woods?
After the Super Bowl and thinking back on the season, I'm VERY down on Van Jefferson. I think he's a JAG with some speed and offers nothing else. I'd rather just not re-sign OBJ and keep Woods I think.
Woods to the Vikings makes a lot of sense. O'Connell wants to bring a great culture to Minnesota. Woods knows his system and would be a great mentor to Justin Jefferson and certainly help Cousin's.
Yeah, he seems a little more "jaggy" to me now. Is he just benefitting from a great system, but he offers not so much himself?I'm a bit torn...
Surely we can afford an EDGE and CB along with keeping Woods?
After the Super Bowl and thinking back on the season, I'm VERY down on Van Jefferson. I think he's a JAG with some speed and offers nothing else. I'd rather just not re-sign OBJ and keep Woods I think.
There is an 8 million dead money hit if they trade Woods according to some. Next winter it will be 4 million. It seems prudent to wait until next year, but I guess it depends on how much they want an edge.Trading Woods or Jefferson makes the most sense. They were taking calls on Woods last year.
I love Robert Woods, he carries a decent cap number and is coming off a torn ACL. I woukdnt be hurt if they traded him.
I'll always appreciate him being apart of the culture that changed the organization.
I still see Van Jefferson being a chance to be traded too (1, not both)
We all know the Rams love to wheel and deal but it’s a guessing game at this point because it’s rarely the obvious.This is why I have ZERO problem with Von Miller taking the Bills deal. Teams are going to do what’s best for them 100% of the time. Doesn’t matter how special a player is to the organization, how gut wrenching it might be for the fans….if a team can improve via trade, they will do it. So yeah I have no problem with a player prioritizing self over team when it comes to contracts. Teams do the same.
That said, this *is* the best move for LA imo. Also super curious what else is coming. Jourdan was pretty clear on Twitter and in her piece yesterday that more stuff is coming.
Yes, my guess is Robinson's cap number is not bad this yr, but next yr would be more of an issue with 3 high paid WR's.There is an 8 million dead money hit if they trade Woods according to some. Next winter it will be 4 million. It seems prudent to wait until next year, but I guess it depends on how much they want an edge.
Does it make sense for two teams trying to save money to swap expensive contracts? *shrug*
I’m going to guess that a Stafford, Kupp, and Donald contract extension will mean that the Rams are going to need to shed some contracts next winter. Maybe they’ll want to give it one more shot with this group, and simply are taking calls like we’ve heard about Woods every off season. Losing Miller hurts, but will McVay concede a piece of the offense to get an edge rusher?