Desjuan is the new HoechtThe Rams love them some flexibility. It makes it a lot harder for the opposition to know what they are doing based on personnel. Offense or Defense. Plus I have heard Johnsons named called out on TV way more than Hampton. In fact I can't remember hearing Hamptons name.
Those names and several others are the reason that I'm reluctant to see the Rams use draft capital for a QB "with upside".Most definitely, its exactly why the NFL stands for Not For Long since things can change so fast. Just when you think you know a player has great upside or is a sure thing, reality can sometimes destroy that notion. Sam Bradford, RG3, Wentz, etc.....there's long list out there for sure.
If you're saying that QBs bust at a higher rate than other positions, I agree.Those names and several others are the reason that I'm reluctant to see the Rams use draft capital for a QB "with upside".
Yeah sure, there's been several other positions that were top 10 pick busts, but I think that recovering from a bust as a QB pick is probably the toughest thing for a team to recover from.
As you mentioned, Sam Bradford, RG III, Ryan Leaf, Wentz, JaMarcus Russell, Trey Lance .........
If you are saying that Purdy is a recovery from the Lance pick, I'd have to say that is actually a case in point.If you're saying that QBs bust at a higher rate than other positions, I agree.
If you're saying that it's harder to recover from a failed QB than for other positions, I disagree. The 9ers recovered very well from Trey Lance and they paid an astronomical price for him. The key is be decisive and move on quickly when you see he's not it.
I wasn't actually focused on Purdy. I was considering that the 9ers have been very competitive throughout the Lance fiasco. They've been strong playoff participants and SB contenders despite it. That's the bottom line at the end of the day, which means that failed pick didn't cripple the franchise.If you are saying that Purdy is a recovery from the Lance pick, I'd have to say that is actually a case in point.
I'm not really sold on Purdy. And I can't think of another decent example of that, even if you argued that Purdy actually is a good example.
But yeah, mostly it's a QB position issue.
Most of the teams where one of the top QB picks ends up being a bust don't do very well for a longer period of time than say, a top DB bust or maybe an OT bust type of player.I wasn't actually focused on Purdy. I was considering that the 9ers have been very competitive throughout the Lance fiasco. They've been strong playoff participants and SB contenders despite it. That's the bottom line at the end of the day, which means that failed pick didn't cripple the franchise.
IMO, the biggest reason for that is because Shanahan didn't invest too much time in Lance. He never turned over the keys to the kingdom. The Lance scenario and the Rams still being a great team despite lacking 1st round picks eight years in a row show that the key for recovery of a failed early pick is a strong team infrastructure that drafts well overall and coaches that talent up.