Rams trade Akers to Vikings for pick swap.

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.
Status
Not open for further replies.

WestCoastRam

Legend
Joined
Nov 17, 2014
Messages
6,241
Ok….but why 2026?

Did one of us not have picks in the round we wanted to swap, over the next 2 drafts?
Cause that's how little they valued him.

A pick is less valuable the further away it is in years. Generally speaking, it's worth one round less every year out. So if it's a swap of their 6th for our 7th it's really a sway of their 8th for our 9th... well.... you get the drift!
 
Last edited:

Dodgersrf

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Mar 17, 2014
Messages
11,341
Name
Scott
Cause that's how little they valued him.

A pick is less valuable the further away it is in years
That we know.

What we don’t know are the picks.

If it’s a 7 for a 6, ‘24 or ‘25 would have been bad enough.
 

majrleaged

Hall of Fame
Joined
Sep 10, 2016
Messages
4,227
One guy in 6 plus seasons. Says a lot about the guy. Seems like We not me is just fine as long as I get mine.
 

kurtfaulk

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Sep 7, 2011
Messages
16,588
.

What the fuck is it with Snead and 6th round picks?

.
 

dang

Legend
Joined
Mar 15, 2018
Messages
7,497
Vikings knew he would be released likely by Friday and took advantage. They need Akers but we’re willing to wait for the release of him.
 

Elmgrovegnome

Legend
Joined
Jan 23, 2013
Messages
22,775
This blows. If Akers works out for Minnesota he’s well worth more than a 6-7 round pick. Technically it sounds like the Rams are swapping Akers and a 7th to get a sixth.

So, if Akers plays well and hits free agency, then he could get the Vikings a 2024 6th round comp. Which is more value than what they traded to get him.

I guess it gets some money off the books?
 

dieterbrock

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jan 3, 2013
Messages
24,036
Pretty much Couldn’t have been a better time to be trading a starting RB than it is/was now
And this is the best deal they could get for Akers.
Not sure if it’s necessarily a reflection on Akers or the RB position in general.
Or both
 

El Chapo Jr

Legend
Joined
Feb 10, 2021
Messages
5,070
I'm really really hoping this makes him a RB1 up there. Alexander Mattison has been doodoo and I need them fantasy points.
That's some hopeful wishing. I argued with some earlier that Mattison was a JAG, but I'll state the same about Cam. I will add he's just a slightly better JAG than Mattison, but I get where you're coming from fantasy wise lol
 

El Chapo Jr

Legend
Joined
Feb 10, 2021
Messages
5,070
This blows. If Akers works out for Minnesota he’s well worth more than a 6-7 round pick. Technically it sounds like the Rams are swapping Akers and a 7th to get a sixth.

So, if Akers plays well and hits free agency, then he could get the Vikings a 2024 6th round comp. Which is more value than what they traded to get him.

I guess it gets some money off the books?
Akers won't do anything in Minnesota. He's nothing special.
 

DeaconJones

Rookie
Joined
Feb 25, 2016
Messages
145
Not much of a return. I was hoping we would trade him for a cup of coffee, but instead all we got was the DIFFERENCE between a small coffee and medium coffee, three years down the road. Much ado about next-to-nothing. Still, we got SOMETHING, so a win for the Rams.
 

kurtfaulk

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Sep 7, 2011
Messages
16,588
This blows. If Akers works out for Minnesota he’s well worth more than a 6-7 round pick. Technically it sounds like the Rams are swapping Akers and a 7th to get a sixth.

So, if Akers plays well and hits free agency, then he could get the Vikings a 2024 6th round comp. Which is more value than what they traded to get him.

I guess it gets some money off the books?

If it's conditional the 6th rounder may turn into a 5th rounder.

.
 

kurtfaulk

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Sep 7, 2011
Messages
16,588
Pretty much Couldn’t have been a better time to be trading a starting RB than it is/was now
And this is the best deal they could get for Akers.
Not sure if it’s necessarily a reflection on Akers or the RB position in general.
Or both

Mcvay said Akers played his last down for the Rams. I'm surprised anyone traded for him at all. I'm not sure why Mcvay is always hell bent on destroying trade value on players he wants off the team.

.
 

rdlkgliders

"AKA" Hugo Bezdek
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jul 1, 2013
Messages
8,235
Name
Don
We moved up a round for a previously injured, presently underperforming and likely often unhappy player.
Not sure what anyone could get for a player of this nature.

Moving On.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.