No hindsight here. I hated the contract for two reasons.
1. I never trust a runningback’s longevity if he has had a torn ACL.
2. It threw runningback contracts out of kilter. It was so much more than RBs were currently getting. It seemed unnecessarily excessive and would have a bad effect on the cap and future runningback contracts
That is the shortest lived position in the league. They take a pounding and can be injured at any time due to constant contact.
I remember shortly after McVay's first year and seeing the all the players breaking out, I immediately said to myself "DON'T sign Gurley". We were never going to be able to keep everyone.
Luckily this has worked out for us so far, only because all the guys we let go have been disappointments except Saffold. I suppose if I could have let Gurley walk to keep Saffold, I would have done that.
PFF is a joke to a lot of people, but their average rating of Gurley made me take a step back and really look at him and our run game - in 2017 I think he was truly amazing. But in 2018 something changed, even when he was putting up similar stats. His longest run was, I think, 20 or 30-something yards. He was still fast, but you could begin to see that "any" RB could do similar things to what he was doing. Then CJ Anderson came in and confirmed that. With Saffold our run blocking was unbelievable, and that's essentially what PFF was saying about Gurley.
Now, his pass blocking and receiving was good enough for me to agree that PFF was off base - BUT it did make me step back and really look at him. And now with this year, having signed Gurley at all was really, really confusing.