Rams one of the worst offseasons in football

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.

Flint

Pro Bowler
Joined
Aug 17, 2017
Messages
1,632
The rams came in at number 27 in the worst offseason in football according to ESPN. That means only 5 teams had a worse offseason, and what’s the reasoning behind that? The Rams didn’t address the oline and instead drafted another wr.
makes sense, of course some media expect the rams to go deep in the playoffs also.
 

Angry Ram

Captain RAmerica Original Rammer
Joined
Jul 1, 2010
Messages
18,000
ESPN:

stone cold GIF
 

FarNorth

Hall of Fame
Joined
Jun 23, 2014
Messages
3,063
The rams came in at number 27 in the worst offseason in football according to ESPN. That means only 5 teams had a worse offseason, and what’s the reasoning behind that? The Rams didn’t address the oline and instead drafted another wr.
makes sense, of course some media expect the rams to go deep in the playoffs also.
Well... it’s no doubt a knee jerk statistical rating based on Rams’ admitted salary cap limitations causing them to lose players and lack of high draft picks. But it fails to consider the strength of the roster, acquisitions of Stafford and speed receivers, and potentially very strong actual draft. Not to mention addition by subtraction of inconsistent players.
 

FaulkSF

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Aug 9, 2016
Messages
5,978
Name
FaulkSF
Not like they had to sign Bell, Clayton and Bennett to stay under the cap #bluefontintended
 

Elmgrovegnome

Legend
Joined
Jan 23, 2013
Messages
23,249
Well... it’s no doubt a knee jerk statistical rating based on Rams’ admitted salary cap limitations causing them to lose players and lack of high draft picks. But it fails to consider the strength of the roster, acquisitions of Stafford and speed receivers, and potentially very strong actual draft. Not to mention addition by subtraction of inconsistent players.
Who did they lose that was inconsistent?
 

Mojo Ram

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Feb 3, 2013
Messages
23,612
Name
mojo
This also from ESPN "experts"

Phoenix Suns (2) vs. Los Angeles Lakers (7)​

Jerry Bembry: Lakers in 6

Nick DePaula: Lakers in 6

Nick Friedell: Lakers in 6

Kirk Goldsberry: Lakers in 7

Tim Legler: Lakers in 6

Zach Lowe: Lakers in 6

Tim MacMahon: Lakers in 6

Bobby Marks: Suns in 6

Dave McMenamin: Lakers in 6

Monica McNutt: Lakers in 7

Kevin Pelton: Lakers in 7

Omar Raja: Lakers in 7

Jorge Sedano: Lakers in 6

Ramona Shelburne: Lakers in 6

André Snellings: Lakers in 7

Marc J. Spears: Lakers in 6

Royce Young: Lakers in 7

Ohm Youngmisuk: Lakers in 6


Final tally: Lakers (17), Suns (1)
Final real world result: Suns in 6, Lakers go home.
----------------
How'd that one go? Lol. Nothing to see here nor there. ESPN writers are dopes and wouldn't know an objective free thinking prediction if it bit them in the ass. They're job is to give the casual fan what they want to see & hear. Big names, twitter drama and big market teams.

Rams significantly upgraded at the most important position on an already loaded roster. If Chicago, Pittsburgh, New England, Dallas or New York had landed Stafford ESPN would have ranked them in the top 5 and slobbered about it all summer.
 

HX76

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Oct 27, 2013
Messages
3,250
Hasn’t the off-season still got quite a way to go? What a load of bollocks
 

Flint

Pro Bowler
Joined
Aug 17, 2017
Messages
1,632
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #12
This also from ESPN "experts"

Phoenix Suns (2) vs. Los Angeles Lakers (7)​

Jerry Bembry: Lakers in 6

Nick DePaula: Lakers in 6

Nick Friedell: Lakers in 6

Kirk Goldsberry: Lakers in 7

Tim Legler: Lakers in 6

Zach Lowe: Lakers in 6

Tim MacMahon: Lakers in 6

Bobby Marks: Suns in 6

Dave McMenamin: Lakers in 6

Monica McNutt: Lakers in 7

Kevin Pelton: Lakers in 7

Omar Raja: Lakers in 7

Jorge Sedano: Lakers in 6

Ramona Shelburne: Lakers in 6

André Snellings: Lakers in 7

Marc J. Spears: Lakers in 6

Royce Young: Lakers in 7

Ohm Youngmisuk: Lakers in 6


Final tally: Lakers (17), Suns (1)
Final real world result: Suns in 6, Lakers go home.
----------------
How'd that one go? Lol. Nothing to see here nor there. ESPN writers are dopes and wouldn't know an objective free thinking prediction if it bit them in the ass. They're job is to give the casual fan what they want to see & hear. Big names, twitter drama and big market teams.

Rams significantly upgraded at the most important position on an already loaded roster. If Chicago, Pittsburgh, New England, Dallas or New York had landed Stafford ESPN would have ranked them in the top 5 and slobbered about it all summer.
The truly hilarious part was hearing the “experts” overwhelmingly pick the Lakers after game 3, with some doubting the sun’s ability to win another game, then totally flip when the Lakers showed themselves to be a paper tiger. And the stats were coming fast and furious; Lebron’s Lakers have never lost in rd 1, Lakers have a winning record being down 3-2, Brady can do it so can Lebron.
I can only guess the media response, age and injury doomed the Lakers, the front office failed Lebron again, hilarious.
 

Tano

Legend
Joined
Jun 11, 2017
Messages
10,302
The truly hilarious part was hearing the “experts” overwhelmingly pick the Lakers after game 3, with some doubting the sun’s ability to win another game, then totally flip when the Lakers showed themselves to be a paper tiger. And the stats were coming fast and furious; Lebron’s Lakers have never lost in rd 1, Lakers have a winning record being down 3-2, Brady can do it so can Lebron.
I can only guess the media response, age and injury doomed the Lakers, the front office failed Lebron again, hilarious.
The problem was - the "experts" were finally seeing a fairly healthy Lebron and Davis after game 3 and then Davis got hurt in game 4.

Lakers need both Lebron and Davis to be a very good team.

One goes down - and they become an average team.
 

Ramstien

Hall of Fame
Joined
Oct 15, 2016
Messages
2,590
Name
Ramstien
The only time I have watched ESPN in the past 15 years is when there is a game on that channel and then I use the mute button, Those guys are a bunch of Jack asses, except for Warner of course.
 

MadGoat

Mathematically alive
Joined
Jul 31, 2016
Messages
1,909
The only time I have watched ESPN in the past 15 years is when there is a game on that channel and then I use the mute button, Those guys are a bunch of Jack asses, except for Warner of course.
A year ago we downsized to just 10 al-la-carte channels on Spectrum, and ESPN didn't make the cut. I haven't missed it once,
 

fearsomefour

Legend
Joined
Jan 15, 2013
Messages
17,639
The truly hilarious part was hearing the “experts” overwhelmingly pick the Lakers after game 3, with some doubting the sun’s ability to win another game, then totally flip when the Lakers showed themselves to be a paper tiger. And the stats were coming fast and furious; Lebron’s Lakers have never lost in rd 1, Lakers have a winning record being down 3-2, Brady can do it so can Lebron.
I can only guess the media response, age and injury doomed the Lakers, the front office failed Lebron again, hilarious.
It’s called injuries......but ok.