Rams Looking hard at DeVante Parker?

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.

RamsJunkie

ARE YOU NOT ENTERTAINED!
Joined
Dec 3, 2013
Messages
2,093
DeVante Parker - WR - Player
CBS Sports' Jason La Canfora believes Louisville WR DeVante Parker could be a top-10 pick.

Parker is considered by many to be the No. 3 receiver in this class behind Amari Cooper and Kevin White, but some NFL evaluators have Parker ahead of White and not far behind Cooper. "Parker is the kind of kid who could go to the right spot and put up 1,200 receiving yards as a rookie," one personnel man said. "He's that good." The Rams and Vikings pick Nos. 10 and 11, respectively, and are said to be looking hard at Parker. At 6'3/209, he's a first-round lock.

Source: CBS Sports
Apr 10 - 12:16 PM
 

RamsJunkie

ARE YOU NOT ENTERTAINED!
Joined
Dec 3, 2013
Messages
2,093
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #2
It's difficult to make too many declarative statements three weeks out from the NFL Draft, given all the subterfuge and misinformation floating around, to say nothing of the innate unpredictability of the three-day event itself. But I will say this: I can't imagine the Patriots don't come away with a wide receiver fairly early in the draft.

Here's why.

Their presence at Pro Days that featured receiver prospects was clearly noticed by their counterparts around the league, and head coach Bill Belichick himself attended several of them – and not just those featuring players deemed to be first-day prospects.

New England is putting considerable resources into scouting this position and while this group isn't as top heavy as last year's record receiver crop, it has plenty of intriguing possibilities and several instances in which beauty is in the eye of the beholder.

Scouts from other teams told me they were told by several college coaches about Belichick's presence around their Pro Days, putting receivers on the board, grilling them if he got the chance, being very hands-on in this pursuit. It wasn't uncommon at all for New England to have a contingent of three people at some of the visits, including personnel chief Nick Caserio, a former Division III college quarterback who threw to receivers at some workouts, including Maryland's.

The Pats have other needs for sure – the exodus of their top corners in free agency for one left a void, especially with Darrelle Revis now back in New York – and that may be a position they address first. Belichick will always be in the market for defensive linemen he sees value in, but the Patriots want to add weapons for Tom Brady, realizing they still don't have a true outside presence beyond tight end Rob Gronkowski, when is split out there.

bill_belichick_draft.jpg

Bill Belichick has been spying on wideouts this spring. (USATSI)
The receiver who I hear scouts gush quietly about the most is Louisville's DeVante Parker. A year ago around the combine I wrote what several evaluators I really trusted were telling me – that Odell Beckham, Jr. was to them the top receiver in the draft and would be a steal. I'm hearing some similar buzz about Parker and I am sure the Pats are on him, but if so it would likely take a considerable trade up to land him.

I'm not sure he gets past the 10/11 range, where the Rams are looking long and hard at him and, at 11, the Vikings have spent considerable time scouting him in the regular season (their top personnel people attended several games), and, with Vikings quarterback Teddy Bridgewater a Louisville product, there are too many obvious connections to ignore.

Parker has pretty much everything scouts are looking for. People rave about his hands and route running. I know some evaluators have him ranked higher than Kevin White, for instance, and while Amari Cooper is seen by some as the safest of the receivers, Parker might not be that far behind. “Parker is the kind of kid who could go to the right spot and put up 1,200 receiving yards as a rookie,” one personnel man said. “He's that good.”

I've heard some differing opinions on Central Florida's Breshad Perriman, with some who have been around his college team closely believing he is merely a fly pattern, deep ball guy with just straight-ahead speed who drops too many balls. But another evaluator I trust thinks that Perriman is more polished than White in terms of route running and could be a better player. Both are burners, for sure, but I have heard a few teams pumping the brakes on Perriman and preferring some other options, particularly because they don't trust his hands .

If three receivers go in the top 10, then several others will continue to be pushed up the board as well (I have a hunch USC's Nelson Agholor, who is flying somewhat under the radar, cracks that late first round group). If the Patriots end up staying at pick number 32, I can't help but wonder if troubled but talented receiver Dorial Green-Beckham comes into play. Adding a 6-6 target for Brady might help take that offense to another level, not that the Super Bowl champs aren't already quite good to start.

Draft notes

Middle linebackers: I'm starting to wonder if we don't see an inside linebacker go even in the top two rounds, and I can't get anyone to say anything positive about the group of tight ends and safeties available.

TCU's Paul Dawson is projected by some as a first-round pick, but scouts hate his attitude and don't like the vibes about him on campus and some who have studied him closely believe he's really a third-round talent. But the fact he may be the best of a weak crop of inside backers and the fact this draft isn't all that robust with talent overall could push him higher than where he should go. “Is he really going to go in the first round?” one evaluator asked. “How could he go that high? I wouldn't have anything higher than a third-round grade on him even if he was clean (from a character standpoint).” Some are projecting UCLA's Eric Kendricks in the first round, and he has special bloodlines, but I'm not putting him in this equation because 4-3 teams see him more as a weak-side guy than their middle linebacker.

Tight ends: As for the tight ends, despite there being a lot of needy teams picking in the back end of the first round, no one is vouching for any of these prospects as legitimate first-rounders, and there might be quite a fall ahead for them. The more football people talk privately about Maxx Williams and Devon Funchess, and how they run some routes the wrong way, and the holes in their game, the more I wonder if South Carolina's Rory Anderson might be a guy to watch as going higher than some would project.

Safeties: With the safeties, Alabama's Landon Collins is getting mocked pretty high – and he may be the best of a very weak group at his position – but he's seen as an in-the-box guy and I had several execs tell me they wouldn't take him in the first round.

“Tight end and safety, in this draft, is a wash,” the exec said. “If that's what you're looking for here, good luck.”

byron_jones_jlc_usatsi.jpg

Byron Jones wowed scouts at the combine. (USATSI)
Byron Jones: Still plenty of differing opinions on UConn corner Byron Jones, a combine warrior I recently profiled with some good tape as well. Mixed opinions on whether or not he shoots into the first round. I have a hunch he does, though I'm not sure I see it with New England as some are projection (and Belichick certainly does love him some UConn prospects over the years).

On the depth of first-round talent: In a good year there might be 22-24 players who have true first-round grades. This year I've had execs tell me they can't get to 20 in some cases, and some teams struggle to find 16 kids who truly merit first-round grades. Could make the back end of the first round a real crapshoot, with so much beauty in the eye of the beholder, and dependent on the type of scheme a team runs …

Latest on Randy Gregory: Sure, Randy Gregory is getting dinged by teams because of his failed drug test at the combine – and they question his decision making knowing well in advance he would be tested there – and that caused him to drop on subsequent mock drafts.

And character is supposed to matter more than ever now, and yada, yada, yada.

But when you strip that away and talk pure football and pass rushers, I don't hear anyone who doesn't think he's one of at least the top three in the draft, and several believe he's top two. I hear concerns about Vic Beasley being able to keep weight on and being a tweener and I hear people wondering why Donte Fowler didn't have more big-play production and I hear people wondering if Shane Raye is really a top-10 talent, but aside from Gregory's issues with pot, I don't hear too many other reasons why he isn't in the top 10 or top five.

So I guess what I'm saying is, I'm starting to think the closer we get to the draft that he will be.

The Redskins and Jaguars and Bears and Falcons are just some of the teams in the top 10 desperate for pass rush. I still can't help but wonder if Gregory is one of the top two or three defensive players off the board, even with the red flag. I have Washington and Chicago pretty locked into pass rushers, and both teams have front office/coaching ties back to San Francisco, a team that took plenty of risks on character kids with mixed results. Could be he doesn't get past that seventh pick, despite the failed tests.
 

WestCoastRam

Legend
Joined
Nov 17, 2014
Messages
6,241
I wouldn't be in love with this pick at 10 but I wouldn't cry either. Our WR core isn't THAT stable. Quick's going into his last year, right? And he's injured. Givens has a year left on his contract but he's nothing special. If we remove those two, we really only have Britt, Austin and Bailey to rely on. I'm pretty sure we'll be drafting a WR somewhere in this draft.
 

JonRam99

Hall of Fame
Joined
Aug 4, 2014
Messages
2,330
Name
Jonathan
If he's really all that & a bag of chips, I'd rather take him & the Duke OG in the 2nd, than take an OG in the 1st & DGB in the 2nd.
If all 3 WR's are taken by #10 (i.e. if the vikes move up to #8 or #9 or something) I'll be pretty bummed. Scherff might be a good consolation prize, if he's even still there at #10.
I'll tell you what, though, I'm incredibly intrigued by this draft. I love the thought of talent falling in our laps, or the mystery of whether Snead might move up to get White or Cooper. I love this a whole lot better than picking #1 / #2 & worrying whether they're going to turn into a bust.
 

RamsJunkie

ARE YOU NOT ENTERTAINED!
Joined
Dec 3, 2013
Messages
2,093
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #5
If he's really all that & a bag of chips, I'd rather take him & the Duke OG in the 2nd, than take an OG in the 1st & DGB in the 2nd.
If all 3 WR's are taken by #10 (i.e. if the vikes move up to #8 or #9 or something) I'll be pretty bummed. Scherff might be a good consolation prize, if he's even still there at #10.
I'll tell you what, though, I'm incredibly intrigued by this draft. I love the thought of talent falling in our laps, or the mystery of whether Snead might move up to get White or Cooper. I love this a whole lot better than picking #1 / #2 & worrying whether they're going to turn into a bust.

Its definatly a fun unpredictable spot to be in.
 

Athos

Legend
Joined
May 19, 2014
Messages
5,933
I wouldn't be in love with this pick at 10 but I wouldn't cry either. Our WR core isn't THAT stable. Quick's going into his last year, right? And he's injured. Givens has a year left on his contract but he's nothing special. If we remove those two, we really only have Britt, Austin and Bailey to rely on. I'm pretty sure we'll be drafting a WR somewhere in this draft.

There is that, but I just don't believe DGB would be there in the 2nd anyway. He's going late 1st, early 2nd. He may even go sooner if the right team likes him.

Parker is interesting. @jrry32 believes he's a Jordy Nelson type. I think he has a bit of a higher ceiling. He is a guy who missed 7 games, SEVEN games, and this is college ball, and 1st game back puts up 132 yards. Then the following week, 214 against FSU. 180 against UK, and 120 against UGA.

That's kinda crazy.
 

CGI_Ram

Hamburger Connoisseur
Moderator
Joined
Jun 28, 2010
Messages
49,205
Name
Burger man
I like Parker. I was going to create a topic weeks ago about him as a possibility.
 

CGI_Ram

Hamburger Connoisseur
Moderator
Joined
Jun 28, 2010
Messages
49,205
Name
Burger man
I like Parker. I was going to create a topic weeks ago about him as a possibility.
 

jrry32

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jan 14, 2013
Messages
29,932
Parker will be a fine pick if he's the guy. Good prospect. Great feet for a big WR and very quick but he's not very physical. As I said before, I see Jordy Nelson or a poorer man's A.J. Green. But he'll be a good NFL WR.
 

Athos

Legend
Joined
May 19, 2014
Messages
5,933
Parker will be a fine pick if he's the guy. Good prospect. Great feet for a big WR and very quick but he's not very physical. As I said before, I see Jordy Nelson or a poorer man's A.J. Green. But he'll be a good NFL WR.

He'll be a chain moving beast imo, who can also be a TD machine. I'm still not convinced we have a guy who can go out there and catch 80 balls. Parker has the feet, hands, and quickness to wrack up 1st downs, which is really important if we plan on keeping that run preference style.

Poor man's AJ Green is still a very good WR.
 

Memento

Your (Somewhat) Friendly Neighborhood Authoress.
Joined
Jul 30, 2010
Messages
18,325
Name
Jemma
More like a broke man's A.J. Green. I don't see that in Parker. I see Nelson as his ceiling. And Nelson's not a bad receiver; he's better than anything we have right now.

And I wouldn't take him at ten.
 

jrry32

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jan 14, 2013
Messages
29,932
He'll be a chain moving beast imo, who can also be a TD machine. I'm still not convinced we have a guy who can go out there and catch 80 balls. Parker has the feet, hands, and quickness to wrack up 1st downs, which is really important if we plan on keeping that run preference style.

Poor man's AJ Green is still a very good WR.

As I said, he's a good prospect. Nothing wrong with the pick. Only big concern I have with him is durability.

I wouldn't even go as far as to call him a poor man's A.J. Green. Just poorer. A.J. was better but it's not a mountain of a difference.
 

Athos

Legend
Joined
May 19, 2014
Messages
5,933
As I said, he's a good prospect. Nothing wrong with the pick. Only big concern I have with him is durability.

I wouldn't even go as far as to call him a poor man's A.J. Green. Just poorer. A.J. was better but it's not a mountain of a difference.

lol. Not calling you out or anything, just describing the type of WR he is. I think he'd be awesome for our system.

I'm not too concerned with his durability. I don't remember him having issues outside of last year. And we have enough weapons he shouldn't have an issue.

Love that smoothness he has though. It's pretty impressive a guy that big.
 

jrry32

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jan 14, 2013
Messages
29,932
lol. Not calling you out or anything, just describing the type of WR he is. I think he'd be awesome for our system.

I'm not too concerned with his durability. I don't remember him having issues outside of last year. And we have enough weapons he shouldn't have an issue.

Love that smoothness he has though. It's pretty impressive a guy that big.

Foot injuries on WRs are always a thing to be concerned about. It's like back injuries with OLs. Plus, Parker is such a thin framed guy.

But yes, his feet are crazy light and agile for his a 6'3" guy. And he has outstanding body control. Can really go up and get the football. Great hands. Would have been the top WR taken in quite a few of the recent drafts.(2013, 2012, 2010, 2009, 2008, etc.)
 

Athos

Legend
Joined
May 19, 2014
Messages
5,933
Foot injuries on WRs are always a thing to be concerned about. It's like back injuries with OLs. Plus, Parker is such a thin framed guy.

Turf toe I'd be worried about. Plantar fasciitis I'd worry. Not so much a broken toe on a young kid. Especially the way he came back. Point of being thin framed though, but the way NFL rules are these days, I'm not going to worry as much as say, I would even 3 or 4 years ago.
 

jrry32

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jan 14, 2013
Messages
29,932
Turf toe I'd be worried about. Plantar fasciitis I'd worry. Not so much a broken toe on a young kid. Especially the way he came back. Point of being thin framed though, but the way NFL rules are these days, I'm not going to worry as much as say, I would even 3 or 4 years ago.

It wasn't a broken toe. He broke a bone in his foot. And I felt like he was favoring it a tad in some of the games I watched.
 

Mr. Walker

Rookie
Joined
Mar 30, 2015
Messages
454
Name
Scott
I'd be fine with the pick. The Rams could do a lot worse, and i think I would select Parker over some of the O-Linemen who some analyst have us taking at that spot. And I would certainly take him over Perriman.
 

FRO

Legend
Joined
Jun 1, 2013
Messages
5,308
If La Confora is the source then we all know it's not happening.

I would be fine with Parker at 10, but I wouldn't pick him before White or Cooper.