You and me both man. Personally, I consider him a top 10 talent...we had a shot at drafting a top ten offensive talent....Floyd or DeCastro, and I'm happy. Otherwise, I'd rather have Claiborne tbh.Memento said:As for Brockers? I'm not impressed. I want him to succeed, I really do, but I feel that there were better options at that point (like DeCastro).
I think Fisher/Snead saw the dropoff after Brockers to be too huge to pass up when compared to the relative closeness of all receivers they've evaluated. Now we have a pretty stout (and young) defensive line that is going to get really good together. The best way to keep pressure off of your own offense is to keep the score close and get the opposing offense off the field. Cordy Glenn in the 2nd and Reuben Randle (wish-list) would be excellent additions to the offense tomorrow.Ramrasta said:Personally, I see that drafting a DT with our first pick was a waste. I would love to be wrong but it seems that it was more reasonable to fill that gap with one of our multiple second round picks. I just can't picture Brockers as that high quality of a player even though he is huge.
But think about DeCastro...Him and Harvey Dahl? Oh dang. Wells isn't a great run blocking Center, but we could get some power up the middle.X said:I think Fisher/Snead saw the dropoff after Brockers to be too huge to pass up when compared to the relative closeness of all receivers they've evaluated. Now we have a pretty stout (and young) defensive line that is going to get really good together. The best way to keep pressure off of your own offense is to keep the score close and get the opposing offense off the field. Cordy Glenn in the 2nd and Reuben Randle (wish-list) would be excellent additions to the offense tomorrow.Ramrasta said:Personally, I see that drafting a DT with our first pick was a waste. I would love to be wrong but it seems that it was more reasonable to fill that gap with one of our multiple second round picks. I just can't picture Brockers as that high quality of a player even though he is huge.
steferfootball said:But think about DeCastro...Him and Harvey Dahl? Oh dang. Wells isn't a great run blocking Center, but we could get some power up the middle.X said:I think Fisher/Snead saw the dropoff after Brockers to be too huge to pass up when compared to the relative closeness of all receivers they've evaluated. Now we have a pretty stout (and young) defensive line that is going to get really good together. The best way to keep pressure off of your own offense is to keep the score close and get the opposing offense off the field. Cordy Glenn in the 2nd and Reuben Randle (wish-list) would be excellent additions to the offense tomorrow.Ramrasta said:Personally, I see that drafting a DT with our first pick was a waste. I would love to be wrong but it seems that it was more reasonable to fill that gap with one of our multiple second round picks. I just can't picture Brockers as that high quality of a player even though he is huge.
There are still some good DTs on the board, and imo DeCastro > Brockers.
On quick:QuantumOfSalas said:steferfootball said:But think about DeCastro...Him and Harvey Dahl? Oh dang. Wells isn't a great run blocking Center, but we could get some power up the middle.X said:I think Fisher/Snead saw the dropoff after Brockers to be too huge to pass up when compared to the relative closeness of all receivers they've evaluated. Now we have a pretty stout (and young) defensive line that is going to get really good together. The best way to keep pressure off of your own offense is to keep the score close and get the opposing offense off the field. Cordy Glenn in the 2nd and Reuben Randle (wish-list) would be excellent additions to the offense tomorrow.Ramrasta said:Personally, I see that drafting a DT with our first pick was a waste. I would love to be wrong but it seems that it was more reasonable to fill that gap with one of our multiple second round picks. I just can't picture Brockers as that high quality of a player even though he is huge.
There are still some good DTs on the board, and imo DeCastro > Brockers.
I think Glenn should be 33 then 39 Randle then if Jenkins is there we need to take him. Cardinals receivers are too good now lol
Rams seem to be high on Brian Quick too. I'll be watching that one.
Interesting tidbit. I think if we could sneak him in the top of the third, that'd be an interesting guy to watch.Claimed at the Senior Bowl that he rarely received positional coaching at Appalachian State and that his experience with the Minnesota Vikings staff was first time he'd had a receivers coach.
My opinion is that we don't have the luxury of waiting until the third....too many guys went already.steferfootball said:On quick:QuantumOfSalas said:steferfootball said:But think about DeCastro...Him and Harvey Dahl? Oh dang. Wells isn't a great run blocking Center, but we could get some power up the middle.X said:I think Fisher/Snead saw the dropoff after Brockers to be too huge to pass up when compared to the relative closeness of all receivers they've evaluated. Now we have a pretty stout (and young) defensive line that is going to get really good together. The best way to keep pressure off of your own offense is to keep the score close and get the opposing offense off the field. Cordy Glenn in the 2nd and Reuben Randle (wish-list) would be excellent additions to the offense tomorrow.Ramrasta said:Personally, I see that drafting a DT with our first pick was a waste. I would love to be wrong but it seems that it was more reasonable to fill that gap with one of our multiple second round picks. I just can't picture Brockers as that high quality of a player even though he is huge.
There are still some good DTs on the board, and imo DeCastro > Brockers.
I think Glenn should be 33 then 39 Randle then if Jenkins is there we need to take him. Cardinals receivers are too good now lol
Rams seem to be high on Brian Quick too. I'll be watching that one.
Interesting tidbit. I think if we could sneak him in the top of the third, that'd be an interesting guy to watch.Claimed at the Senior Bowl that he rarely received positional coaching at Appalachian State and that his experience with the Minnesota Vikings staff was first time he'd had a receivers coach.
DR RAM said:My opinion is that we don't have the luxury of waiting until the third....too many guys went already.steferfootball said:On quick:QuantumOfSalas said:steferfootball said:But think about DeCastro...Him and Harvey Dahl? Oh dang. Wells isn't a great run blocking Center, but we could get some power up the middle.X said:I think Fisher/Snead saw the dropoff after Brockers to be too huge to pass up when compared to the relative closeness of all receivers they've evaluated. Now we have a pretty stout (and young) defensive line that is going to get really good together. The best way to keep pressure off of your own offense is to keep the score close and get the opposing offense off the field. Cordy Glenn in the 2nd and Reuben Randle (wish-list) would be excellent additions to the offense tomorrow.Ramrasta said:Personally, I see that drafting a DT with our first pick was a waste. I would love to be wrong but it seems that it was more reasonable to fill that gap with one of our multiple second round picks. I just can't picture Brockers as that high quality of a player even though he is huge.
There are still some good DTs on the board, and imo DeCastro > Brockers.
I think Glenn should be 33 then 39 Randle then if Jenkins is there we need to take him. Cardinals receivers are too good now lol
Rams seem to be high on Brian Quick too. I'll be watching that one.
Interesting tidbit. I think if we could sneak him in the top of the third, that'd be an interesting guy to watch.Claimed at the Senior Bowl that he rarely received positional coaching at Appalachian State and that his experience with the Minnesota Vikings staff was first time he'd had a receivers coach.
Sorry, my bad. Quick in the third would assume that we were double dipping on WRs.QuantumOfSalas said:DR RAM said:My opinion is that we don't have the luxury of waiting until the third....too many guys went already.steferfootball said:On quick:QuantumOfSalas said:steferfootball said:But think about DeCastro...Him and Harvey Dahl? Oh dang. Wells isn't a great run blocking Center, but we could get some power up the middle.X said:I think Fisher/Snead saw the dropoff after Brockers to be too huge to pass up when compared to the relative closeness of all receivers they've evaluated. Now we have a pretty stout (and young) defensive line that is going to get really good together. The best way to keep pressure off of your own offense is to keep the score close and get the opposing offense off the field. Cordy Glenn in the 2nd and Reuben Randle (wish-list) would be excellent additions to the offense tomorrow.Ramrasta said:Personally, I see that drafting a DT with our first pick was a waste. I would love to be wrong but it seems that it was more reasonable to fill that gap with one of our multiple second round picks. I just can't picture Brockers as that high quality of a player even though he is huge.
There are still some good DTs on the board, and imo DeCastro > Brockers.
I think Glenn should be 33 then 39 Randle then if Jenkins is there we need to take him. Cardinals receivers are too good now lol
Rams seem to be high on Brian Quick too. I'll be watching that one.
Interesting tidbit. I think if we could sneak him in the top of the third, that'd be an interesting guy to watch.Claimed at the Senior Bowl that he rarely received positional coaching at Appalachian State and that his experience with the Minnesota Vikings staff was first time he'd had a receivers coach.
Possibility of a Glenn, Randle, Quick type of 2nd round?
He's got skills for not having a positional coach. I had one of those at the JUCO level.
Ramhusker said:No on Jenkins, No on Jeffries. Trouble waiting to happen with those two.
I could see Glenn, Randle, Brown/David but I could also see another trade down if somebody is giddy about Upshaw. Do the Eagles need Upshaw? I could see the Rams giving 33 up for 46 and 51. They could still do pretty damn good at hole plugging with 39, 45, 46, and 51.
@RavensInsider: Already hearing rumors about the Rams getting calls for their first pick tonight. Teams are interested in Stephen Hill.
Not surprising. Happens every year since the new 3 day draft format.JdashSTL said:@RavensInsider: Already hearing rumors about the Rams getting calls for their first pick tonight. Teams are interested in Stephen Hill.
steferfootball said:Not surprising. Happens every year since the new 3 day draft format.JdashSTL said:@RavensInsider: Already hearing rumors about the Rams getting calls for their first pick tonight. Teams are interested in Stephen Hill.
I'd be hesitant to move down more than one or two spots. I really want Cordy Glenn and Ruben Randal.
I've said it before...Stephen Hill intrigues me, but we need a number one guy, Hill is too much of a project for us at the moment imo. If we had an outside threat and were looking for a complement, I'd draft him.