It would be interesting to see how that would be interpreted. My understanding is that conduct detrimental to the league is more aimed at illegal activity, not speaking your mind on your personal time. The only time I've seen the league fine coaches or players is when they said something in the post game pressers when they are still on mandatory NFL time.
I think more - this is just something you don't say out loud. It may amount to nothing. The zebras should just let it slide. Then again, if some young player said it, the refs have to know that it goes a lot deeper than one player. Maybe they need something like this to realize the perception that is pretty prevalent inside (I assume) and outside of locker rooms.
“Criticism of officiating has always been considered conduct detrimental to the League”
This is just an excerpt from the Competition Committee’s page. But I am not sure what, if anything, the Comp Committee has to do with rule enforcement.
Ultimately, this new behavior from Puka. Til this point he has been viewed as a overall good guy. Therefore i wouldn’t expect him to get suspended.
If this were a pattern of behaviors I could see a possible big fine or MAYBE a one game suspension.