I'm not sure how it would be disingenuous. If one poor pass constitutes shitting the bed then virtually every QB shits the bed every week. The QB needs to step up and make a lot more good plays than bad and you hope they don't throw picks. Defenders drop passes all the time. That's generally why they are not receivers. Matthew balled out most of the game and had to escape sacks several times. He finished with a QB rating above 96 with almost a 70% completion %. How in any definition is that shitting the bed? A couple arrant throws? That's a pretty harsh litmus test. Your boy G-string threw for a little over 50% and should have had 3 INTs. He got lucky on 2.
You seem to think McVay should be able to get Grabmypole to get us to the promise land if he is as good as Sham-ahan. Yet Shammy and his QBs seem to shit the bed on the regular in clutch situations.
Sorry. But Stafford is still an elite QB and gives you a far better chance at winning the big games than almost any QB in the league and certainly more so than any rookie. G-string and other lower level QBs give you a chance to win some games with a stacked roster while choking in big games ala Darnold. Stafford gives you a chance to win with his grit combined with his skill.
The Rams were down three in the 4th quarter and the defense had just made a big stop and got the ball back with the team having no challenges or timeouts left. On the very first offense play afterwards Stafford throws that punt that Tartt dropped which could have very well changed the game. It didn't and that's great. But, IMO that's crapping the bed in a clutch situation. Unlike some, I can't completely ignore how horrible a play that was for Stafford just because it worked out for the Rams.
If the tables were turned and Garoppolo had completed 70% of his passes with a QB rating above 96, throws the same punt and the Rams defender makes that pick, and the Rams go on to win the game probably just about everyone here would say that Garoppolo crapped the bed. But, we can't say it because it's Stafford and things worked out for the Rams. OK.
Next. Garoppolo is not my boy. I just have confidence that if Shanahan can get to 3 Championship Games & a Super Bowl with him at QB, then McVay could have success with him, too. In no way does that mean that I believe that he's a better option than Stafford.
That said, it wouldn't just be Garoppolo vs. Stafford.
It would be Garoppolo & the players obtained and kept due to trade compensation and cap savings vs. Stafford.
Again, Stafford already is set to count right about or over $50 million against the salary cap for the next couple of seasons with only about $62 million scheduled as salary and bonuses for those next
TWO SEASONS.
And this is before he gets let's say 2 years at $110 fully guaranteed (per Giants fan sources). The Rams have a
very tough decision on whether to do or how to structure a deal as it could possiby cost them other players either this year or in the future.
The first domino might even be Alaric Jackson if they can't work out a long term deal before the new business season begins and want to consider a franchise tag option at about a $25 million or so cap number due to the weakness of the LT draft and free agency class. That option may be off the table altogether depending upon what happens.