Kentuckyrams
Pro Bowler
- Joined
- Apr 22, 2016
- Messages
- 1,947
I liked what I saw goff do in the first (Preseason) series against the best d in football. Marched right down and made a big boy throw for a td in Denver. He's probably more comfortable than that now and i'd like to see him start against Tampa. If he can't hang in the first half then put Case in for the 2nd half and let the d save the day. I don't see goff doing any worse, and I'm thinking he'd be better then keenum, based on what goff has done with the the starters.
That's my concern - we gave up so much for Goff, but will we have an offense that makes that worthwhile? It's sort of like why buy a luxury sports car if you only plan on going 25 mph on a dirt road?
Ok but Keenum does have 2 int on the season so I don't think the mistake free card belongs in his deck.
Keenum was pretty awful, and has been for two games now.
I like the guy, but inaccurate passes have hurt us, small size has hurt us, and taking sacks that he could have thrown away almost cost us the game yesterday (took us out of field goal range, and shortened our drives).
The system and playcalling is also bad, so it's not all on Keenum.
I think Keenum did an overall good job yesterday, however, there easily could have been one or two pick 6's. One in particular was that screen pass to Austin(?) that bounced off of his stone hands into the air, between two Hawk defenders....It was pure luck we didn't get killed on that one...and even though it wasn't in Keenum's power to stop his WR from creating a jump ball, Keenum would have been blamed for the turn over and the lost game. There would be pro-Goffers in here crucifying pro-Keenumers....lol
I have read this before and I don't get it. What specifically do you mean Keenum can't stretch the field? Did he not throw a 40 yard pass down the left sideline to Kendricks yesterday?
Not taking sides in the Keenum versus Goff debate. Just stating that when the Rams run a play-action pass and a receiver runs down the field, Keenum has the arm strength to get the ball there.
To me, it's the offensive philosophy. If you put Goff in the game, are the Rams all of sudden going to start throwing the ball 30 - 40 yards downfield every other time they throw the ball? I don't think so. I was at camp in Irvine for 5 or 6 of the 11-on-11 practices and a majority of the time the passes go to short and intermediate routes.
True, although one was a batted ball into the air. Not entirely his fault. His other one was bad.
Not on Sunday. His numbers would've been better if Kenny didnt drop that 3rd down and Lance kept his feet in. He had a good game Sunday.
It's hard to just throw the ball away when you are in the defenders arms almost immediately after the ball is snapped. Not his fault.
So does that mean that putting in Goff would or wouldn't change the offense? Would it just be more Fisherball? And if that's the case (no pun intended), then why give up so much for Goff?
Keenum almost had two pick sixes in this pre season. But with that said, he didn't do anything yesterday "to lose this game" with our awesome Ds balls out playing. But he can't stretch the field and Gurley is getting smacked at the line of scrimmage on every dam play. If Gurley can get past the first line of D he can be a home run hitter, and that is going to win games, not Keenum. Hurry up Goff!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I have read this before and I don't get it. What specifically do you mean Keenum can't stretch the field? Did he not throw a 40 yard pass down the left sideline to Kendricks yesterday?
Not taking sides in the Keenum versus Goff debate. Just stating that when the Rams run a play-action pass and a receiver runs down the field, Keenum has the arm strength to get the ball there.
To me, it's the offensive philosophy. If you put Goff in the game, are the Rams all of sudden going to start throwing the ball 30 - 40 yards downfield every other time they throw the ball? I don't think so. I was at camp in Irvine for 5 or 6 of the 11-on-11 practices and a majority of the time the passes go to short and intermediate routes.
Keenum can throw a deep ball. They are less about arm strength than they are about touch and accuracy. Keenum's biggest issue is throwing into tight windows in the intermediate range, especially outside the numbers. His passes float. He just doesn't throw with a lot of zip.
But for me, arm strength isn't the big problem with Keenum. It's his inconsistent accuracy, issues with field vision, and struggles with the blitz.
Um... She's pretty hot. Thinking that's a bad example.Gentlemen, regardless of how you spin it, Keenum is still the girl with a great personality.
I think Keenum did an overall good job yesterday, however, there easily could have been one or two pick 6's. .....
Um... She's pretty hot. Thinking that's a bad example.
That would be called coaching....Maybe some offensive designs are designed around a players abilities.
I never bought this stuff. You always hear it but I don't buy it. Any other position there are not these concerns. Switch out a RB or Onlineman and there is no hang wringing about his confidence. What this narrative is really about is prep reps for a QB. By default the starter gets the lion share of reps.Pulling a rookie QB after a half isn't probably the greatest thing you can do for his psyche.
John Elway was not placed in a dink and dunk offense because he could thread a needle by throwing a laser 50 + yards in the air placing the ball in the face of his receiver in between two defenders, so the horizontal bop football offense was not going to fit his talents. Keenum would not have performed in that offense and would have been picked off twenty times a game trying to do that. So an intelligent coach would call plays that Keenum could make, and that is because we have a guy that "can't stretch the field." And to me that means getting defenses out of the 8 and 9 men in the box. When Elway faced that type of defense it was on an all out blitz and he made them pay big time for it. I don't see defenses respecting Keenum or his arm strength and they won't because they know that Gurley will beat them for a touchdown long before Kennums arm will. Without checking stats I bet Gurley has had longer touchdown runs that Keenum has had touchdown passes. And those stats that you put up were including RAC and YAC. I bet Keenums passes in the air were much shorter than what in on the stat sheets.No idea what you're implying.
My experience with luxury sports cars is that there is a break-in period.
Until my car reaches 2000 miles, I keep it under 4500 rpm as directed.
You want to hit the power band after the car has tempered a bit.
http://www.porscheownersmanuals.com/2014-macan/11/5-30767/Brake-pads-Breaking-in-new-brake-pads