You better believe I have!@Loyal
Imagine an offensive line of :
LT- NoteBoom
LG-Edwards
C - Creed
RG- Bruss
RT - Haventstein
That would be like an injection of Viagra.
Personally, I let the Humphrey/Atwell thing go a long time ago but now you made me miserable over the Brady/Bowen fiasco.Imagine if we drafted Brady at 198 instead of Matt Bowen. Jeeze. Can we end this Creed thing finally. That was my hope for the pick- but we didn’t pick him. Allen had a great year. We won the freaking Super Bowl. Holy macaroons smh
Imagine if we drafted Brady at 198 instead of Matt Bowen. Jeeze. Can we end this Creed thing finally. That was my hope for the pick- but we didn’t pick him. Allen had a great year. We won the freaking Super Bowl. Holy macaroons smh
@bubbaramfan already providing us an early training camp report...Nice!Most notable Bruss stat: Zero holding penalties in 3 years.
Every time @Loyal sees Tutu on the football field, it's like an injection of Viagra.
Logan "Greyhound" Bruss. Or maybe Logan "School" Bruss. Either way can't wait to see him and Hav/Higs running some student body right. Have to think there's some good run results in our future this year with that Wisconsin right side plus a nasty 1-2 punch at RB.
Or maybe someone needs to get his jersey with just "Bus" on the back.
@bubbaramfan already providing us an early training camp report...Nice!
I enjoy your posts, so I hope you don't take this the wrong way. But, most of the time, I have no idea what you are talking about. Or better yet, how it relates to the conversation. LOL.What ? Light it up. Mary J is legal
Well the film short of tells you that with his stiff arms.He has good hands.
Then you read about the size of his hands & it becomes more impressive.
I’ve noticed how holdingninnThe NFL is not called if you keep your hands inside.So could be a big benefit.
Rams considered trading up for Logan Bruss: 'We need this lineman, we need a starter'
Cameron DaSilva /May 11, 2022 5:58 am PT
Rams considered trading up for Logan Bruss: 'We need this lineman, we need a starter'
A new video from the Rams’ war room on draft night shows Sean McVay and Les Snead debating trading up to No. 99 for Logan Brusstheramswire.usatoday.com
You could tell the Los Angeles Rams were thrilled with landing Logan Bruss at No. 104 overall in the third round because Les Snead turned down offers to trade back and accumulate picks. Not only did he decline those offers, but he and Sean McVay considered trading up to make sure they could select Bruss in the third round.
A new behind-the-scenes video from the Rams’ “Inside The Draft” series showed McVay and Snead discussing the possibility of calling the Browns about the 99th overall pick. They chose not to, which worked out in their favor and allowed them to keep the sixth-rounder they would have traded.
“We gotta really ask ourselves, though, if we’re going to give up a sixth, is that not (worth it)?” McVay asked.
“Oh, is a sixth-round pick worth a starting guard? Yes. The answer is yes,” Snead replied.
McVay: “I know that. That’s what I’m saying. At what point are we bidding against ourselves, though? Do we need to get in front of any of these teams but also be aware that we’re not competing. … Should we call Cleveland? I would just say, what’s the worst thing for calling one of these teams? What’s the worst thing they’re going to say? In all seriousness, we have a guy that we identify, or do you say sit tight for the next six picks and trust it? But I know this: We’ve gotten to 98, it takes so little to get up there. Is it worth it? I’m just throwing out possibilities.
“We need this lineman. We need a starter.”
The Chiefs at No. 103 were the last hurdle in the Rams’ way. And McVay knew that as long as their pick wasn’t Bruss, the Rams would get their guy.
“This is going to work out exactly like we wanted to,” McVay said.
It’s obvious that McVay really liked Bruss, and that he’s not overly confident in the other guards the Rams have on the roster as they attempt to replace Austin Corbett. Bruss won’t be handed the starting job, but given the way the Rams are talking about him, he has a great chance to take the field in Week 1 between Rob Havenstein and Brian Allen.
Lol they watched the latest ‘Inside the draft’ and made a story from it.Rams considered trading up for Logan Bruss: 'We need this lineman, we need a starter'
Cameron DaSilva /May 11, 2022 5:58 am PT
Rams considered trading up for Logan Bruss: 'We need this lineman, we need a starter'
A new video from the Rams’ war room on draft night shows Sean McVay and Les Snead debating trading up to No. 99 for Logan Brusstheramswire.usatoday.com
You could tell the Los Angeles Rams were thrilled with landing Logan Bruss at No. 104 overall in the third round because Les Snead turned down offers to trade back and accumulate picks. Not only did he decline those offers, but he and Sean McVay considered trading up to make sure they could select Bruss in the third round.
A new behind-the-scenes video from the Rams’ “Inside The Draft” series showed McVay and Snead discussing the possibility of calling the Browns about the 99th overall pick. They chose not to, which worked out in their favor and allowed them to keep the sixth-rounder they would have traded.
“We gotta really ask ourselves, though, if we’re going to give up a sixth, is that not (worth it)?” McVay asked.
“Oh, is a sixth-round pick worth a starting guard? Yes. The answer is yes,” Snead replied.
McVay: “I know that. That’s what I’m saying. At what point are we bidding against ourselves, though? Do we need to get in front of any of these teams but also be aware that we’re not competing. … Should we call Cleveland? I would just say, what’s the worst thing for calling one of these teams? What’s the worst thing they’re going to say? In all seriousness, we have a guy that we identify, or do you say sit tight for the next six picks and trust it? But I know this: We’ve gotten to 98, it takes so little to get up there. Is it worth it? I’m just throwing out possibilities.
“We need this lineman. We need a starter.”
The Chiefs at No. 103 were the last hurdle in the Rams’ way. And McVay knew that as long as their pick wasn’t Bruss, the Rams would get their guy.
“This is going to work out exactly like we wanted to,” McVay said.
It’s obvious that McVay really liked Bruss, and that he’s not overly confident in the other guards the Rams have on the roster as they attempt to replace Austin Corbett. Bruss won’t be handed the starting job, but given the way the Rams are talking about him, he has a great chance to take the field in Week 1 between Rob Havenstein and Brian Allen.
Well, Anchrum was hurt last yr. Shelton is at best a quality back up center and emergency OG. Evans has yet to break through and is in the last yr of his contract as is Edwards & Havenstein. So yes, they needed a starter.Lol they watched the latest ‘Inside the draft’ and made a story from it.
If they really felt that they needed a starter on Oline then that tells you what they think of the backups abilities.
I have no way of knowing this other from very far away in the free state of Florida but I can predict there will be a very big battle between Tremayne Anchrum who entering his 3rd TC & the newly arriving rookie Logan Bruss for the starting RG post.Well, Anchrum was hurt last yr. Shelton is at best a quality back up center and emergency OG. Evans has yet to break through and is in the last yr of his contract as is Edwards & Havenstein. So yes, they needed a starter.
At worst, he gets beat out by Anchrum who pulls a Brian Allen with his opportunity, but Bruss will be starting by 23' at worst.