- Joined
- Nov 3, 2013
- Messages
- 44,076

Or just having bodies so our guys don't get hurt in a meaningless preseason gameThe O.L signings are a little surprising.
Always strengthening that group I suppose
Or just having bodies so our guys don't get hurt in a meaningless preseason gameThe O.L signings are a little surprising.
Always strengthening that group I suppose
Yeah could be, porous o line play does expose other positions to injury but that could be it.Or just having bodies so our guys don't get hurt in a meaningless preseason game
I really don't think so.The O.L signings are a little surprising.
Always strengthening that group I suppose
Again could be, I just dont think you can evaluate the other positions groups fairly behind an Oline that is there just to fill out a roster as is being intimated.I really don't think so.
The five projected starters (if healthy) and Humphries are certain not to play on Saturday.
If projected back-ups McClendon, Limmer and Dedich also sit out; and, with Lampkin injured, that would leave just seven healthy O-Linemen ... Quessenberry, Leveston, McMahon, Bowles, Arcuri, Wedig and Dooley.
Couple of those seven guys might have a chance for the 53-man roster. Several are probably ticketed for the Practice Squad; and the Rams may not want to have them play significant snaps.
I think the signings of McAllister and Leglue are simply to have enough OL for Saturday.
Or is there a trade upcoming?Gotta believe they’d snatch Schrader if cut.
I would be okay with that tradeTrade a 7th and Rivers for a 6th to the Browns. Don’t make me tempt you with a good time Les!
Just don't let Snead give him away for a 6th rounder.Nobody will want Rivers. My bet is if the Rams move one of the RBs it will be Corum.
Nobody will want Rivers. My bet is if the Rams move one of the RBs it will be Corum.
So you honestly think John Leglue was signed because he's part of the Rams plan on the OL? Just asking here because I'm not sure where you're going with this negativity about our OL.Yeah could be, porous o line play does expose other positions to injury but that could be it.
We will know Saturday
What do you think we could get for him? I'm not too keen on the idea of moving a former 3rd round pick in his 2nd year for a 6th or 7th.Nobody will want Rivers. My bet is if the Rams move one of the RBs it will be Corum.
Relax, your perception of my negativity isn't accurate.So you honestly think John Leglue was signed because he's part of the Rams plan on the OL? Just asking here because I'm not sure where you're going with this negativity about our OL.
Our RB room is deep but I 100 agree, teams in need aren't looking for Rivers level of help. Corum maybe but return would likely still be lower than what his worth may be.Nobody will want Rivers. My bet is if the Rams move one of the RBs it will be Corum.
Yeah, it's pretty obvious that they brought in some bodies so they could sit out the majority of the OL who will make roster. Not sure why anyone is reading anything more into those signings.So you honestly think John Leglue was signed because he's part of the Rams plan on the OL? Just asking here because I'm not sure where you're going with this negativity about our OL.