- Joined
- Jun 20, 2010
- Messages
- 35,623
- Name
- The Dude

- Thread Starter Thread Starter
- #61
And then nothing. Since the systematic dismantling of the GSOT legacy, nobody was any good.And then?
And then nothing. Since the systematic dismantling of the GSOT legacy, nobody was any good.And then?
Yeah, I'm sad to say I just can't muster as much objectivity for Bulger as I should. They guy just seemed to be so Teflon coated when it came to criticism and probably more importantly, really seemed to be Martz's pet. Could never understand the patience and benefit of doubt given to him when he never really did anything and the opposite treatment Warner got.Yeah, he wasn't everyone's cup of tea. I'm not really that invested in rehashing anything Bulger/Warner related. I was just sayin'. He was pretty damn good his first few years, and feel as though that should be acknowledged. After that, meh. I don't think many people have him registered in their mental football annals of greatness.
Considering that Warner has really said nothing but positive about Martz since leaving the Rams... I don't think any of this this is the case. You're entitled to your opinion though.You're implying that Warner wouldn't have found his groove again with the Rams because it took him years to get back to that form elsewhere. While that may be an important aspect to the conversation, the reality is, Warner and Martz had irreconcilable differences and that would prevent Warner from ever regaining his form more than anything else. They simply couldn't co-exist anymore and in retrospect, that seems to be on Martz. It's very debatable whether Warner would have tried the gloves any sooner if Martz was still on his side, there was no in-fighting in the front office and if Warner didn't feell his job was being threatened.
My point is, there was LOT going on that makes this more than a clinical/fiscal decision by the Rams. Instead of Martz, imagine Vermeil in charge and how he might have handled Warner's various hand injuries. I'm compelled to think that he would have exhausted every option before deciding to move on from Warner. Martz was all too eager to prove that his system was what deserved praise and moving on to Bulger seems like what he wanted to do. But I think it's questionable to say that Warner, if...IF healthy and using the gloves couldn't have found success with the 2003-2006 Rams teams.
The main difference is that the Bulger had nobody else on the roster doing better than him with the same team.Yeah, I'm sad to say I just can't muster as much objectivity for Bulger as I should. They guy just seemed to be so Teflon coated when it came to criticism and probably more importantly, really seemed to be Martz's pet. Could never understand the patience and benefit of doubt given to him when he never really did anything and the opposite treatment Warner got.
Well, Warner remaining classy since leaving the Rams doesn't erase all the things that were said while he was still with the team. Things were not all peaches and cream between Warner and Martz. I don't think that's even debatable. There are many quotes out there from Warner expressing his frustration and disappointment at how he was treated after a certain point.Considering that Warner has really said nothing but positive about Martz since leaving the Rams... I don't think any of this this is the case. You're entitled to your opinion though.
The main difference is that the Bulger had nobody else on the roster doing better than him with the same team.
I was as big a Bulger supporter as anyone, since I didn't blame him at all for the whole Warner situation, but if someone on the team outplayed him, I would have moved on, no problem.
If someone on the Rams outplayed Bradford, I would happily move on as well (though I don't want a draft pick spent on that just yet.) It's a business, and you have to go with who is doing well right now and who's likely to do well in the near future.
Hey, that's really clever. You should trademark it before anyone else uses it.And here I thought that dead horse couldn't be kicked any more. My bad.
Hey, that's really clever. You should trademark it before anyone else uses it.
Well, in the end it all comes down to opinion.Well, Warner remaining classy since leaving the Rams doesn't erase all the things that were said while he was still with the team. Things were not all peaches and cream between Warner and Martz. I don't think that's even debatable. There are many quotes out there from Warner expressing his frustration and disappointment at how he was treated after a certain point.
Trademark what?moklerman with a head scratcher:
Hey, that's really clever. You should trademark it before anyone else uses it.
Just a pet peeve. If one doesn't like a thread or conversation, why not just avoid it?Whats gotten into you?
Just a pet peeve. If one doesn't like a thread or conversation, why not just avoid it?
I already did. Thanks.Hey, that's really clever. You should trademark it before anyone else uses it.
I already did. Thanks.
And my point is that this subject was extremely tired when Bulger WAS a Ram. I was never a Bulger fan - not that it matters. But WTF? I hardly think this is the same as saying any other topic is beating a dead horse. Current topics may get beaten to death but Bulger is far from a current topic and it has certainly been beaten to death in years past when it was at least close to current. Bulger as a topic may be the most beaten to death topic that ever existed on a Rams forum and may be THE most divisive as well.
You want me to be cool with seeing it crop up again? Can't help you. So yeah - this dead horse has been beaten to death.![]()
Because of what the subject turns a thread into. Have you ever seen Bulger turn a thread in a good way?Just a pet peeve. If one doesn't like a thread or conversation, why not just avoid it?
Note the change. Thought I had resized the circle R down enough. Apparently that didn't work.Isnt that the radio shack logo?