- Joined
- Jun 24, 2010
- Messages
- 35,402
- Name
- Stu

What? You don't? Fuckin' peasant.I'm a little upset that a person could actually have a billion dollars.
A billion ...... dollars.
Fuck.
What? You don't? Fuckin' peasant.I'm a little upset that a person could actually have a billion dollars.
A billion ...... dollars.
Fuck.
Because billionaires don't become billionaires by buying things or starting a business just to sit at the same value or take a dip. Their egos alone won't go for that.The obvious question to me which is raised by your point.... What does having the value of the team increase do for him if he has zero intention of selling the team? As far as MAKING $$$ regarding a new stadium, land, parking, concessions, naming rights, etc. he would enjoy all of that when he builds a new stadium in STL. Would he not? All without the price of a relocation fee, higher cost of living, cost of construction, development etc. in CA, and so on.
The one thing that Kroenke has shown to be VERY CONSISTENT with, he doesn't buy teams in various sports to SELL them off. So increasing the perceived value on paper does NOTHING to his bottom line.
I believe he has 4 Billion.I'm a little upset that a person could actually have a billion dollars.
A billion ...... dollars.
Fuck.
An his wife has another 6 Billion!I believe he has 4 Billion.
Shh! Don't tell the sportswriters at the PD!An his wife has another 6 Billion!
Do you really think that will be the angle that he takes if he decides to pack up and leave in the middle of the night?
I am just curious..
I have to disagree on the value of the team point. With as much money as Stan has, why would he do ANYTHING to create more wealth given that argument? The value of what you have is HUGE to people like Stan whether you intend to sell it or not. Let's not kid ourselves. If nothing else, it is a gauge of how successful you were with that aspect of your career. Think that doesn't matter to him?
You can argue how he intends to build that value. Is it ROY or net value or...? But to think Stan doesn't care how much the Rams are worth isn't really logical.
Let's say you and I both own the same kind of classic sports car. This year they are worth 30k. I sell mine, you keep yours.
Who has more money?
So five years later that car is worth 40k but you don't sell yours.
Who has more money?
The obvious question to me which is raised by your point.... What does having the value of the team increase do for him if he has zero intention of selling the team? As far as MAKING $$$ regarding a new stadium, land, parking, concessions, naming rights, etc. he would enjoy all of that when he builds a new stadium in STL. Would he not? All without the price of a relocation fee, higher cost of living, cost of construction, development etc. in CA, and so on.
The one thing that Kroenke has shown to be VERY CONSISTENT with, he doesn't buy teams in various sports to SELL them off. So increasing the perceived value on paper does NOTHING to his bottom line.
The value of the team argument is one of the more foolish parts of these discussions. I'm amazed that people can't see how meaningless that is.
There won't be a normal fee either......it'll be a billion.
As I've said, moving to LA would be the dumber option, and it's so obvious I don't understand why people can't get it. Kroenke would be a fool to drop a billion to move to LA then pay rent in a stadium. And we know Kroenke is nowhere near a fool.
Just the fact that he may end up with competition in the form of a second team would probably put him off. It would turn me off for sure.
Or how about we both have 85 Camaros. We have no intention of selling them because we also both have mullets. I take mine to Japan. Whose is worth more?
Don't you mean a person other than you,I mean if someone gave you a billion dollars would you refuse it?I'm a little upset that a person could actually have a billion dollars.
A billion ...... dollars.
Fuck.
Of course I wouldn't refuse it.Don't you mean a person other than you,I mean if someone gave you a billion dollars would you refuse it?
How could someone who wasn't a billionaire, or close, afford to pay the players salaries ?
BTW don't take the reply personally,it's just that someone out here in ROD land thought you were serious
Yeah I knew that and forgive me for reacting but IMO the bigotry against extreme financial success is palpable and it still is directed wrongfully at a real life human being who has every right to be free of stereotypes as any of the rest of us.Of course I wouldn't refuse it.
And yeah, I'm upset because I don't have it.
Agreed. I'm capitalist by nature, so I don't care if he has a trillion dollars.Yeah I knew that and forgive me for reacting but IMO the bigotry against extreme financial success is palpable and it still is directed wrongfully at a real life human being who has every right to be free of stereotypes as any of the rest of us.
It's always perplexed me how someone can get all cross ways at Stan who had a fraction of the financial wherewithal Sam Bradford has today at the same age,and turn around and cheer Sam for playing a game .
What do people think Donald Trump's net worth was when he was Sam's age?
I guess I'm just sayin the outrage is sort of selective and it effects immeasurably things like whether St. Louis retains this franchise and if they lose it the reality that WHEN they want another one the price is gonna be higher and OH YEAH the class envy card is the primary tool of the head "tool" at the PD.
Thanks for reading
T![]()
Agreed. I'm capitalist by nature, so I don't care if he has a trillion dollars.
I'm just jealous.![]()