- Joined
- Jan 14, 2013
- Messages
- 29,936
Yes, jrry it is revisionist history, it did not happen, it was someone's pipe dream after they we made because he didn't do something they thought he should, it was nothing more than a a rant. Now he is gone to a team that has more weapons, they are paying him less (why couldn't the Rams get that deal?) and he will be in a better position to succeed. Hopefully they will replace him with someone who can at least replace his production, they are already limited and losing anyone on this offense is a problem.
But I get it, you want to be vindicated this too shall pass.
No one is asserting it happened. So what is being "revised?" A trade offer was on the table. The majority of the fans said take it. The Rams didn't. They made a mistake. That's the entire discussion. There's no revising here. Just reporting the facts.
I don't need to be "vindicated." That already happened when Cook was released. You're the one putting up a huge fight over the Rams making the wrong choice.