- Joined
- Jan 3, 2013
- Messages
- 24,028
It only landed us our starting QB....A late 7th round pick is worth virtually nothing in this draft
It only landed us our starting QB....A late 7th round pick is worth virtually nothing in this draft
As he said, virtually nothing.It only landed us our starting QB....
No the fans were just being fans there is no right or wrong about it and revisionist history is easy. You'll learn more as you get older.Yet, the fans were right.
The Packers suffered at times last year due to their struggle to find consistent, reliable help.Cook should go a little ways toward fixing that problem.
Well they repeated it 3 times in the article maybe it is an incantation to make sure it stick????For the first time in his career, Cook will be reliable? I mean, I'm sure he'll have some big plays. But a reliable receiver? Not so much
Yep Mojo, you need to have one of the best QB's in the NFL that can embed the pigskin up Jared posterior so it remains on Jared body & a seriously legit #1 deep threat @ WR to clear out all those DB who can throw a fist on the football for Jared Cook to be surrounded with to be worth his TE roster spot. I think Jared is a minus to any team unless you have such a duo as the Pack to make Jared a consideration. Sure says a lot about what I think Jared brings to the NFL in his play.alm:Will be watching him in Green Bay for sure. I'm very curious about his production there with Rodgers and a legit #1 WR on the field in Jordy Nelson.
No the fans were just being fans there is no right or wrong about it and revisionist history is easy. You'll learn more as you get older.
Yes, jrry it is revisionist history, it did not happen, it was someone's pipe dream after they we made because he didn't do something they thought he should, it was nothing more than a a rant. Now he is gone to a team that has more weapons, they are paying him less (why couldn't the Rams get that deal?) and he will be in a better position to succeed. Hopefully they will replace him with someone who can at least replace his production, they are already limited and losing anyone on this offense is a problem.This isn't revisionist history. I've already posted the thread and proved it isn't. This isn't a case of hindsight. Many of the people on this forum wanted Cook gone at the time.
There is right and wrong. The fans were right.
Hopefully they will replace him with someone who can at least replace his production...
Sure he'll drop a lot - but he'll also catch a lot. Glad he's gone but wouldn't be surprised if he completely annihilates the numbers he put up here.I'll be the first to say Cook is close to or over 1,000 yards with Rogers.
A real offense and QB makes a big difference. Drops or not.
I don't know. If they expand Kendricks' role a little, he could easily match what Cook was doing.hat's the sad part. There is nobody on the roster that can replace his terrible production.