Jake Says We're Getting Jonathon Taylor... [UPDATE: TAYLOR SIGNS EXTENSION WITH COLTS]

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.

Selassie I

H. I. M.
Moderator
Joined
Jun 23, 2010
Messages
18,088
Name
Haole
So the hold-up has been waiting until after we play each other before the trade is made ? LOL... I just made that up.


Come on. Their drugged out owner isn't gonna trade him... or any of his rock-and-roll memorabilia to anyone. Now I do believe he (referring to the dolts' pill popping owner) actually said something along those lines.

After TG30... I don't see our current football decision makers going after an "older" RB who is looking to get paid top dollar.
 

Stl2La

Hall of Fame
Joined
Aug 23, 2014
Messages
3,581
If we could steal him from Indy like we stole Mr Faulk from Indy then pull the trigger.
I’d say based on recent compensation we’re going over pay as usual. We usually get subpar compensation in return for players we trade away in my eyes.
 

Zodi

Hall of Fame
Joined
Nov 19, 2016
Messages
3,610
After TG30... I don't see our current football decision makers going after an "older" RB who is looking to get paid top dollar.

This.

Gurley signed a 4 year, $57.5 mil contract with $45 mil guaranteed at the age of 24. Jonathan Taylor is currently 24 and looking for $14-17 million annually and who knows how much guaranteed. He's also coming off of his worst season ever and two ankle injuries in 2022.

Mcvay and Snead won the SB with Sony Michel and Cam Akers at RB. I don't think they're interested in repeating the same mistake. Altho, they did try like all hell to trade for CMC last year so who knows.
 

snackdaddy

Who's your snackdaddy?
Joined
May 6, 2014
Messages
11,669
Name
Charlie
Not sure I'd want to give up premium picks and a lot of money for any running back. Plenty of good teams do not have a premier running back. We had no run game when we won a championship. Its not like the old days when the running game was the most important part of an offense.
 

oldnotdead

Legend
Joined
May 16, 2019
Messages
5,406
You have to believe that they will also explore the possibility. Taylor changes the threat level of this offense by a lot. People forget he can also catch. Now look at the Ram offense with Stafford, Taylor, Kupp, Nacua, Atwell and Higbee. What does the defense key on? Right now no one fears the Ram's run game. Stafford would face a whole bunch of zone coverage. That would make the Ram offense a legit Super Bowl caliber unit.

You have to know Snead will at least inquire if he hasn't already. The fact they quit running against the Bengals speaks volumes about their lack of faith in their run game.
 

HitStick

Van Jefferson’s #1 fan
Joined
Jul 27, 2010
Messages
2,540
Honestly, the one thing McVay is missing in his offense is splash plays front the running back. When he came to the Rams and had Gurley, the Rams were a threat to score on any play. Now, without a true running back, teams have seemed to figure out the Rams offense. Stafford coming was a perfect storm of talent, and a new style of offense (more shotgun/less under center) so it worked. Now that teams have figured it out, a threat out of the backfield is key. I’m not talking five yard rushes. I’m talking you take the 3-5 yard rushes because you’ll eventually break one for 40 yards.

We don’t have that.
 

jap

Legend
Joined
Jan 12, 2013
Messages
6,582
Btw i doubt Jonathan Taylor would require a 1st round. I could see 2 2nds tho.
 Or 2 6ths and sign him to a Prove It! contract for remainder of 2023. We could always trade him away for more picks in the off season.
 

OldSchool

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Nov 3, 2013
Messages
40,002
Spending the picks to trade for him that indy wants is a mistake in my book. Signing him for the money he want imo is a mistake.

That said I'll root for him but I think getting a LT or pass rusher is a vastly bigger upgrade in my opinion.
 

Riverumbbq

Angry Progressive
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
May 26, 2013
Messages
11,962
Name
River
If there's any truth to this, ... it's a sign of Rams front office desperation imo.
 

CGI_Ram

Hamburger Connoisseur
Moderator
Joined
Jun 28, 2010
Messages
48,897
Name
Burger man
Taylor would change this offense in a big way.

But, I wouldn't be including a 1st rounder in any offer.
 

Corbin

THIS IS MY BOOOOOMSTICK!!
Rams On Demand Sponsor
2023 Sportsbook Champion
Joined
Nov 9, 2014
Messages
11,898
Jake BoogerEllen is one of the worst people someone cites for anything Rams and is as full of shit as Foolio. (And that’s actually tough to do)
 

den-the-coach

Fifty-four Forty or Fight
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jan 16, 2013
Messages
22,920
Name
Dennis
Spending the picks to trade for him that indy wants is a mistake in my book. Signing him for the money he want imo is a mistake.

That said I'll root for him but I think getting a LT or pass rusher is a vastly bigger upgrade in my opinion.
Agreed, first Taylor needs and wants to be paid, plus you have to give up draft capital and Taylor has so many miles on those tires so although he's 24, he is really 28 in RB years. McVay needs to adapt and use what he has and save the draft capital for a RB in the 2024 draft.
 

Kupped

Legend
Joined
Aug 5, 2021
Messages
8,590
Name
Kupped
The Rams are in a position to make the move, as long as it's not a first rounder, imo.

And, yes, he'd be a difference maker.

225 and a 4.39 40. A true home run threat who knows how to run... in an offense where he will have an actual QB.

Yes, it's against the Rams "model".. and sometimes you can break that model.

With a draft class like this one, plus two emerging classes the previous years, you're in a position to make it happen.
 

Dodgersrf

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Mar 17, 2014
Messages
11,128
Name
Scott
So the hold-up has been waiting until after we play each other before the trade is made ? LOL... I just made that up.


Come on. Their drugged out owner isn't gonna trade him... or any of his rock-and-roll memorabilia to anyone. Now I do believe he (referring to the dolts' pill popping owner) actually said something along those lines.

After TG30... I don't see our current football decision makers going after an "older" RB who is looking to get paid top dollar.
I say, we just tell Taylor to get on the plane and come home with us.
 

FaulkSF

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Aug 9, 2016
Messages
5,673
Name
FaulkSF
In a heartbeat, (don't think they'd take it) - and I love me some Higbee! Even add a fourth.

And while I'm setting conditions: 5 year $50M, $35 guaranteed.

Just seems like in the Rams' history, whenever we were REALLY REALLY good, we had a great RB.
Steven Jackson: Hold my beer

And even sometimes when we were not so great.
 

AvengerRam

Benevolent Troublemaker
Joined
May 9, 2018
Messages
5,321
Jake BoogerEllen
Punch Fist Bump GIF by State Farm

nerds revenge GIF

high five ellen degeneres GIF
 

Jorgeh0605

You had me at meat tornado.
2023 ROD Fantasy Champion
Joined
Jun 18, 2014
Messages
1,898
No validity to this trade at all. I personally don't want an older RB that wants to get paid. Not interested in spending the money needed to make those kind of players happy.
 

Ram Ts

Hall of Fame
Joined
Mar 23, 2020
Messages
2,188
I can’t believe anyone who’s a Ram fan would be ok sending a 2nd round pick for him…let alone two 2nds. A RB who was injured and wants a big money contract. I’d rather keep that 2nd and get another Avila next year. Heck, a drafted RB in the 2nd next year might be better than Taylor.

Not to mention the salary. I’d rather save that money to secure a top notch young FA pass rusher in the off-season.

I’ve yet to see a need for a top RB with McVay anyway. Quite the opposite actually.

Would be a weird fit. Especially with this OL.