I think there is a lot of truth to this, and something I've been saying about McVay's complete stranglehold on the offense, and how that affects Goff's growth at the line of scrimmage. I commented on one play it in ATL game because it stood out to me - ATL was in a nickel package with only 6 defenders near the line of scrimmage, it was one of the lightest boxes we'd seen and we came out in 12 personnel (2-TEs). I'd say even with our o-line that was a free 5-yards and likely more. McVay called a play action-pass, Goff walked up to the line, kept the play on and snapped the ball. The pass was well defended and went incomplete, on to 2nd and 10. And I thought, why the hell wouldn't he audible to a run? It was clear as day they were playing the pass, and especially with Higbee and Everett on the field we had an easy gain on first down if we ran. Why TRY to throw into a tougher look?? Yea of course he completes a ton of passes into those looks, but it illustrates a point where I think he trusts McVay so much, that his route-combos, his schematic concepts will just beat the defense on its own. Instead of him using his eyes and making the correct football play.
I think McVay needs to add more freedom or audible options for Goff, which will help him take the next step. Because I remember how Peyton used to win pre-snap and it was a thing of beauty. But does McVay's offense ALLOW for that type of freedom at the line? All I've heard about the Shanahan system and thus McVays system, is all the audibles are worked in to the play. So they make the call and you just go execute. To me that doesn't develop an independent thinking QB, more of a programmed robot but idk. If that is the case then Goff can't miss reads or throws when they're schemed open.