- Joined
- Jan 14, 2013
- Messages
- 30,531
Ditto. If in doubt... Pass.
I'm not in doubt. Big, deep speed, physical, uses his body well, strong hands and ability to high-point the ball...Evans will be a productive NFL WR.
Ditto. If in doubt... Pass.
Tavon aside, cause I consider him more of an all purpose weapon and not a pure WR, I'm thinking there are at least 8 WRs better than Givens, Pettis, Bailey, and Quick.
Waktins
Evans
Lee
Benjamin
Robinson
Beckham
Cooks
Matthews
Every time I do one of those mock drafts I see a great WR prospects on the board right up to and including our 2nd round pick. Makes me think twice about taking Watkins with our first pick even in a trade down.
I think it may be better to get Matthews or Robinson with the first pick and then a WR with the next pick or the one after that.
Yeah, now Bailey is Isaac Bruce. Here we go.
Evans does have exceptionally strong hands probably in part due to his size. My concern is he does not have explosive speed and does not run clean smooth routes.I'm not in doubt. Big, deep speed, physical, uses his body well, strong hands and ability to high-point the ball...Evans will be a productive NFL WR.
Quick? Dumb as a stump.
I don't know dog, are we comparing them to our WRS or comparing their potential. Potential is subjective for both groups. We all think we know what the college kids bring to the table and he all think we know what the WRS on the Rams potentially bring to the table.
In my opinion I think only Quick has the POTENTIAL to be better than the college receivers on that list. Givens is an enigma. Pettis is Pettis and I think that in the end, Bailey will be limited by his body.
That's my take anyway.
Can't argue with that Dog.Dog with his version:
My opinion is that everyone has potential to be amazing....and conversely, these highly sought after, and well thought of Receivers in the draft can turn into turds.
So in my mind, Givens, Quick, and Bailey have just as much a chance at greatness as any receiver in the draft.
Evans does have exceptionally strong hands probably in part due to his size. My concern is he does not have explosive speed and does not run clean smooth routes.
Lee is far superior with the ball and getting open to get the ball BUT he does not have Evans hands. That is not saying his hands are not good Evans are just better.
I do not want another receiver that is not good running routes and doesn't have elusive speed.
I disagree, but we will see, for our sake I hope the guy we draft turns out great. We will draft a wr maybe not at the top but we will draft 1Lee's hands are not good. Inacurate
Evans has build up speed...which is just as dangerous on deep routes. Evans is a lot like Alshon Jeffery. Deceptive speed, makes tough catches in traffic and uses his big body well. He doesn't need elusiveness. And route running isn't as important to his game. Although he does need to improve in that regard.
I disagree, but we will see, for our sake I hope the guy we draft turns out great. We will draft a wr maybe not at the top but we will draft 1
12% drop rate is horrible. For reference, Mike Evans had a 3.5% drop rate.
Lee also has a nasty habit of body-catching.
and a nastier habit of chewing up defenses and taking the ball to the house from ANYWHERE.
P.S route running is kinda important in the NFL
I don't think this is fair. Quick has shown some progression.
If he flattens out, then we can critique.
In two years? I'd say he's trending up right now."Flattens out"? That would imply he had a spike no?