Elmgrovegnome
Legend
- Joined
- Jan 23, 2013
- Messages
- 23,659
That, along with never putting any emphasis on getting an offensive coaching staff that actually could coach these guys up. Fisher emphasized getting top notch coaches on defense, and the athletes taken on that side of the ball generally worked out. On offense, the best - BEST - offensive coordinator he ever brought in was Schotty ... that's another nutshell that explains the debacle of the Fisher regime.
True, but it was a reflection of his ancient offensive philosophy. Fisher has no business trying to decide over and dictate to a legitimate offensive staff.
Drafting athletes on defense has a higher chance of working out because defense is more based on reactions. Sure they need to know where to line up and their role but the opposing offense dictates the play. They more capable the defenders are to react quickly, while staying balanced and keeping their leverage, the better they will be. It takes much more than that on offense. Raw athletes are not so easy to shape into offensive players. OLine is a position that takes years to master, receiver is a very complex position nowadays, and even RBs are loaded with more responsibility than two decades ago. The offense is a very repetition and precision based game. You can't just take any old athletic freak with little experience and think he will succeed. It isn't likely.
GRob may end up being good one day but it will take a lot longer than four or five years. And it will take a lot more dedication than I think he has.
I would have tried him at DT.