- Joined
- May 16, 2019
- Messages
- 5,406
- Thread Starter Thread Starter
- #41
You know what guys? This is exactly the kind of offseason discussion we need. If there is a more controversial unit on the team I don't know what it is. Because IMO I think we all agree, that after this past season there can be no dispute that how well the o-line plays will be central to how well this team does.
Frankly I still think Evans was not slated to play OT when they drafted him. Just look at his metrics and you see a OG not a OT. In the same way Edwards IMO is out of position at OG and should play OT. Both guys will benefit from having the experience. But both guys need to be played in their natural positions. Ideally I still see the starting OT as:
Noteboom LT
Corbett LG
Allen C
Evans RG
Edwards RT
Gameday swings: Brewer & Shelton
The only hangup I see would be in when Noteboom is going to return.
Regardless, I think we all have our opinions and thoughts on this unit. I can see where some of you are coming from. But in reality, it must be understood that any rookie drafted will be at the same disadvantage all of the current guys experienced last year. So why replace guys who have shown they can play at this level with another question mark? People forget that the C is the QB of the o-line and must make all the blocking calls. Why replace Allen with another rookie who hasn't had time to adjust to the NFL's speed and who hasn't had the mentoring of a good vet as Allen has had? Also, this team has a ton of FAs to sign and although I feel they have the money to do so, I don't see any leftover for another FA signing, especially if it's going to be for a quality player.
That is why I think they will go with who they have. They may or may not use a midround or later pick on an OT depending upon how Noteboom progresses. But as I've said previously, this team's starting roster is set if they sign their key FA's. This draft will be largely drafting for depth and the future IMO.
Frankly I still think Evans was not slated to play OT when they drafted him. Just look at his metrics and you see a OG not a OT. In the same way Edwards IMO is out of position at OG and should play OT. Both guys will benefit from having the experience. But both guys need to be played in their natural positions. Ideally I still see the starting OT as:
Noteboom LT
Corbett LG
Allen C
Evans RG
Edwards RT
Gameday swings: Brewer & Shelton
The only hangup I see would be in when Noteboom is going to return.
Regardless, I think we all have our opinions and thoughts on this unit. I can see where some of you are coming from. But in reality, it must be understood that any rookie drafted will be at the same disadvantage all of the current guys experienced last year. So why replace guys who have shown they can play at this level with another question mark? People forget that the C is the QB of the o-line and must make all the blocking calls. Why replace Allen with another rookie who hasn't had time to adjust to the NFL's speed and who hasn't had the mentoring of a good vet as Allen has had? Also, this team has a ton of FAs to sign and although I feel they have the money to do so, I don't see any leftover for another FA signing, especially if it's going to be for a quality player.
That is why I think they will go with who they have. They may or may not use a midround or later pick on an OT depending upon how Noteboom progresses. But as I've said previously, this team's starting roster is set if they sign their key FA's. This draft will be largely drafting for depth and the future IMO.