Luck is underrated because of one game? Ryan Fitzpatrick threw 3 TDs in 3 Quarters and led his team back from 21 down to a win in his first game. Guess that made him a future superstar?
Luck is treated like he's an elite QB when the reality is that he's been a solid to good QB thus far in his career that has benefited greatly from playing in the worst division in football. Last year, Sam Bradford had a 121.6 QB Rating against the AFC South and averaged 3 TDs per game. You don't think he'd have benefited greatly from playing 6 games a year against Jacksonville, Tennessee, and Houston instead of San Francisco, Arizona, and Seattle?
Luck is a very talented QB but he's not played to his hype as of yet. But people treat him like he has because his TEAM has won.
Kaepernick is a limited QB that is overly reliant on his athleticism. He had Anquan Boldin, Vernon Davis, and Frank Gore last year...and yet the guy needed to ALSO have Crabtree to "catch fire". He isn't a mentally adept QB. He has a strong arm and great athleticism which allow him to compensate for how slowly he processes things, his poor field vision, and his struggles makings his way through progressions.
Kaepernick is lucky to play on an offense with a stellar supporting cast and stellar coaching. Because he'd be a mediocre or worse QB in most other places.
You do know what Bradford would look like considering he's had a worse supporting cast. I don't know where you're trying to go with this one.
BUT AS I SAID BEFORE, Cam Newton is a freak. He'd do well in St. Louis.
Wilson is the best QB of all the guys you named...excluding Cam Newton. And he's flawed. But he's a cerebral, accurate, patient QB that would play solid football for the Rams. Wouldn't have the numbers he did in Seattle but he'd be good for us.
