CoachO
Hall of Fame
- Joined
- Jan 11, 2013
- Messages
- 3,392
McLeod is too small as well
Pretty much the same size as arguably the best safety in the game right now:
29 Thomas, Earl FS 5-10 202 25 5 Texas
23 McLeod, Rodney S 5-10 195 24 3 Virginia
McLeod is too small as well
Gaines has outplayed most people and is fast becoming our best corner. That's not a reflection on Joyner who looked like he can definitely contribute.
Our secondary was a perceived weakness before the season but I'm a huge fan.
Really love the way this defense is coming together and how a REALLLY bad unit a couple of years ago is looking solid for years to come. We have seen injuries to both starters and not much drop off allowing several rookies to get experience.
You nailed it bro! Those guys are defiantly earning their money!I think it's a reflection on the front office and coaching staff to see a 6th round draft pick turn into a star. We clearly have the right scouts in place.
First off coach, haven't talked to you in a while so it's good to hear from you. Secondly you were right about Quick, it's a big shame he got hurt. Felt like he was our best player in the early going.20 Joyner, Lamarcus DB 5-8 184 24 R Florida State
23 McLeod, Rodney S 5-10 195 24 3 Virginia
I'd say McLeod would qualify as bigger than Joyner.
You asked earlier what has McLeod done to be disliked?
How about getting beat more than a couple of times in "deep" coverage, and not reacting to the ball in the air at all. Or biting on underneath routes when he is supposed to be giving over the top support?
The TD vs. Arizona, the TD vs. Dallas, or the long second TD vs. SF come to mind.
He has been very physical, but I would rather have someone that can be trusted in coverage than another thumper who seems to go for the big hit.
What I see is the difference between a natural CB, which is Gaines, and a "tweener", which is Joyner. The Rams simply haven't figured out what's best for Joyner, much like they're just starting to figure out the best way to use TA.Not even close. It looks like Gaines is on the outside in base and nickel back in nickel. I just don't see how you put Joyner back in at nickel when he's healthy. Maybe we can have him play some back-end now at the safety spot (though I wonder if his height there will ultimately be a deficiency).
Fisher wanted to rest him since he had that knee issue earlier in the year.I was at the game and didn't get a chance to rewatch it yet. I noticed towards the end of the game they were playing Barron at nickel with Tru and Gaines on the outside. Did JJ get hurt? Were they trying some new formations? Just curious to see if of you noticed or knew why
It seems this regime places a high value on football intelligence. While they take some risks on tangibles - GRob, BQ - they also grab players that can simply play - McD, Gaines, Joiner, Donald, Tru. It just seems that this regime goes after pure football players over combine type numbers more so than previous staffs.The phrase I used when he was drafted was that, in the Mizzou games I watched, Gaines was a man among boys. It seemed obvious to me that a guy who had meh measurables but off the charts football intelligence would become a good NFL player. But even a Gaines booster like me was surprised how easily he made the change. He looked like a rookie for a few games and now he looks like a vet. Coaches are arrogant enough to think that they can teach any talented athlete how to play in the NFL and I think that is why football intelligence is undervalued.
Gabbert??? No thanks.OK, I'ma believer ....Mizzu all the way....Now lets grab that DGB guy....get some OL's....and a QB.....What's the guys name that threw passes to DX?
They both threw to DX, would pass on both.More like Chase Daniel, i would think.![]()