Good trade him to Chicago, see how you like that weather...There's reason everybody says: "I'm from Chicago." It's because they can't wait to leave.
Sounds like the old, "Hey, I pay you so just shut up and do what I say" mentality. Pretty sure that went out of style in the 1930's...."He gave them good faith"? He signed a contract for 156 mil with 73.5 mil guaranteed. So them saying "you'll have some input on team decisions" includes GM and HC hirings"? And the fact they hired somebody ( without his approval.....what island was he on?), means the cap hit punishment he's trying to saddle them with is fair repairations? BS.
100% Right on.Look man, i don't care how ridiculous it may see for him to have input on team decisions. If FO told him they would listen to him, then they should follow through and take his input. If they don't blatantly lie to him then its not really a problem. But they did, so they deserve every bit of the hurt of their decision.
Sounds like the old, "Hey, I pay you so just shut up and do what I say" mentality. Pretty sure that went out of style in the 1930's....
Here's the rub of it, Watson's agent and Houston began contract negotiations on his extension after his 5th year option was picked up.
We didnt hear about any nasty negotiations, because there werent any.
"My main focus is just being the best teammate, best leader, best quarterback I can be and whenever that time comes with my agent and the organization, the timing is going to be right. They're going to make sure they handle it well. For me right now, the focus is on being the best teammate, getting the new guys on the same page with me as the quarterback of this offense and making sure I'm staying healthy and ready to go whenever they call me, call us in to go play."
Watson was upset when they traded Hopkins which was then and is even moreseo now one of the worst trades ever
“I definitely was hurt when we let Hop go,” Watson said on What’s In Your Glass? “That’s my brother. That’s my dog.”
But he stood by his word, got ready for the season and signed his well deserved contract, said in late August that it wasnt his place to criticize the FO for the trade.
So when O'Brien was finally fired, the face of the franchise wanted to be involved in the hiring of the GM and HC. Who wouldnt be? O'Brien was an abject disaster, made moves that took the team from being a conference contender to a bottom dweller.
So Watson says he wants to have input, of course he should.
What did Houston do? They said absolutely, of course. And then proceeded to go back on their words like nobody's business.
The GM search? What a effing joke. Not only did they not involve Watson, they had a list of candidates being vetted, the final candidates if you will. And which guy did they hire? The guy who wasnt even on the list!!
After Caseiro hire, which was enough of an insult to Watson, McNair/Easterbay patted Watson on the head and doubled down on the commitment that they never intended to honor and said his input would be involved in the HC search.
And then they wouldnt even interview the 2 guys he liked in Saleh and Bienemy
So despite being pro-Owner on most of the debates, I cant see any defense of how Houston handled (IE Botched) this whole thing. And the idea that Watson doesnt have the right to feel betrayed because he's collecting a check? Is downright disgraceful IMO.
If no commitment was made to him from the team, though he may feel slighted, but wouldnt be in this position.
But they did.
Repeatedly
And then repeatedly ignored him and the false commitment
Eff them all, I hope they draft the next Ryan Leaf to replace DW and enjoy a decade of Linehan/Spagnolo futility
I can understand but either waive the no trade clause for all teams or sit out.
A couple of things. Sure Houston.....if they did in fact tell him he'd have input.......is wrong. But 73.6 mil wrong?
The red highlight part of your post......"of course he should"? Why? If they told him he would, sure, but otherwise why? Why should a guy who's getting paid to play QB have any input on who they hire for GM? Head coach, I could see him having an opinion. But in either case he shouldn't have any "pull" at all. If he gives them 2 names they aren't interested in why should they interview them?
He's the QB. Not part owner.
Having said that, if he's unhappy about it, and wants a trade, I can understand but either waive the no trade clause for all teams or sit out. You can say, this is irrepairable and I want out but you can't say I want to go to one of the top 6 teams in the league. Well you can but the hardball I'd be playing is sit out or waive the clause for all teams. I gotta recoup a good deal.
I just think these clowns who sign for ungodly money, then want more, particularly "say" is ridiculous. You want your franchise guy happy? I remember the days when getting paid was what mattered but these 21st century QBs move the goalpost. Getting paid isn't enough. Now they want to run the operation, so say is important. And if they're young or haven't had the big payday and the team is winning, then the money is the most important thing. Here's an idea. Sign your contract, play the game and save your money. When you retire, you can team up with a couple/few other ex-QBs and buy a franchise. Then you can have all the say you want.
What does it matter if he’s paid 1$ or 1 billion? They told him they’d include him in the HC and GM search and then blatantly excluded him.A couple of things. Sure Houston.....if they did in fact tell him he'd have input.......is wrong. But 73.6 mil wrong?
The red highlight part of your post......"of course he should"? Why? If they told him he would, sure, but otherwise why? Why should a guy who's getting paid to play QB have any input on who they hire for GM? Head coach, I could see him having an opinion. But in either case he shouldn't have any "pull" at all. If he gives them 2 names they aren't interested in why should they interview them?
He's the QB. Not part owner.
Having said that, if he's unhappy about it, and wants a trade, I can understand but either waive the no trade clause for all teams or sit out. You can say, this is irrepairable and I want out but you can't say I want to go to one of the top 6 teams in the league. Well you can but the hardball I'd be playing is sit out or waive the clause for all teams. I gotta recoup a good deal.
I just think these clowns who sign for ungodly money, then want more, particularly "say" is ridiculous. You want your franchise guy happy? I remember the days when getting paid was what mattered but these 21st century QBs move the goalpost. Getting paid isn't enough. Now they want to run the operation, so say is important. And if they're young or haven't had the big payday and the team is winning, then the money is the most important thing. Here's an idea. Sign your contract, play the game and save your money. When you retire, you can team up with a couple/few other ex-QBs and buy a franchise. Then you can have all the say you want.
I don't fear him. He better by God fear facing Aaron Donald twice a year if he goes to Frisco...If they don't move him before the draft they're idiots. But then again we know they're idiots. So hell.
Just don't trade him to the 9ers. Please God.
How good would Chicago be and would that make the North the best division of QBs? I don't know.
If they don't move him before the draft they're idiots. But then again we know they're idiots. So hell.
Just don't trade him to the 9ers. Please God.
it’s going to be a bloodbath over the next 10 days or so as players are cut around the league with teams working to get into better cap position. A glut of experienced players is going to be on the street, creating a buyers’ market.
This keeps being said over and over.
and just before the season starts they'll announce record broadcast deals that will lift the cap by $40 million. just after they've screwed players sideways on 1 year deals.
.
A bit more control is fine but......6 months ago he signed a 4 year contract for 156 mil with 73.6 guaranteed. What the hell went wrong in 6 months that justifies demanding a trade? He spend the money? That ain't control. That's aggravated rape.
Okay MAN, that's one opinion.
Mine is he signed a 156 mil deal with 73 guaranteed and now that he has that deal, he wants Houston to trade him to somebody else who will continue paying him that money? Because he claims he was told he would be consulted on team decisions and wasnt asked about the GM? Maybe he was. Maybe he wasn't. Maybe he was on vacation and didn't get back to them fast enough. Maybe those team decisions were about the offense, maybe game plan, maybe free agents, etc. And now that he has butthurt and wants out, he wants to pick where he goes or at least severely limit their options?
Not cool. Sit out, or waive the no trade for all destinations! He's under contract and stands to strap them with some serious dead money. Fact is, he's got that deal and will receive the rest of that money.....either way...if he plays for them or they make a trade with somebody. The only way he doesn't get that money is by sitting out. If the relationship is irrepairable, there's nothing to lose is there? It's pretty simple. Waive the no trade for ALL teams.
If the situation is completely untenable, then out is all that matters, right?
I agree with everything you said but at the same time Watson knew that the Texans fo was garbage and still choose to sign the contract. The Texans aren't gonna take less just because Watson is pissed off and they shouldn't. If Watson really wanted out he would waive the no trade clause and go anywhere but houston.Sorry, but this is just another type of "shut up and dribble" bullshit take.
So, Watson is supposed to just take the money and 100% live up to his contract, but the Texans aren't supposed to live up to their promises made openly and publicly?
Seriously, whatever.
Watson at no time has been "butthurt". That's a gross mischaracterization meant to diminish the professional responsibilities of the Houston Texans org while putting all of the onus on the player who was lied to and disrespected.
You do realize that these players have ambition, right? They want to win championships... most of them, anyway?
It wasn't okay to dismiss the Bob McNair comments calling players, "inmates running the asylum" and it's absolutely not okay to volunteer promises and then blatantly break them because the fallback is just, "shut up and play".
Fuck all that noise.