I read this and it’s really good - but in most of California we are locking down and same as in Austin - is that mitigation or suppression? I know parts of rural Texas aren’t on lockdown so is that mitigation? I mean the hardest hit parts of the USA are obviously locking down. Won’t there be results cause of this? I mean locking down it has to making a difference
Did he expand on that at all? I mean, is better better or of better worse? What's the judgement scale here? I can see an argument being made that a society that makes constructive use of it's prisoners for the rest of society is a better one. I don't think history would agree, but a pragmatic argument could be made.“A society should be judged not by how it treats its outstanding citizens but by how it treats its criminals.”
-Fyodor Dostoyevsky
Did he expand on that at all? I mean, is better better or of better worse? What's the judgement scale here? I can see an argument being made that a society that makes constructive use of it's prisoners for the rest of society is a better one. I don't think history would agree, but a pragmatic argument could be made.
That was kind of my point. The quote is simply unclear. I didn't actually mean to endorse being the kind of people that would do that. Again, history doesn't support the idea that those are better societies.A pragmatic argument could be made for slavery - at least pragmatic for slavers. But pragmatism isn’t everything, morals also matter.
We could harvest organs from prisoners, test pharmaceuticals on them, make them fight for our enjoyment gladiator style. Or we could recognize that even a prisoner is a life - and in many cases the difference between them and us is nothing more than dumb luck.
I would venture to say that everyone on this forum has done something in their lives that could have landed them in prison. Not rape, or intentional murder - but a bunch of people go to prison over accidents. They got reckless and someone died. Which of us hasn’t been reckless?
Dumb luck.
That was kind of my point. The quote is simply unclear. I didn't actually mean to endorse being the kind of people that would do that. Again, history doesn't support the idea that those are better societies.
Did he expand on that at all? I mean, is better better or of better worse? What's the judgement scale here? I can see an argument being made that a society that makes constructive use of it's prisoners for the rest of society is a better one. I don't think history would agree, but a pragmatic argument could be made.
HIGH-LAY-RIOUS!I'm of the mind that they should infect all the prisoners and get it over with. I also think prisoners who are serving life sentences should be used for medical testing programs but in this day and age that type of thing would never be allowed and maybe that's a good thing.
You sound rather put out. Perhaps even victimized by my careless words and grotesque manner?HIGH-LAY-RIOUS!
HAHAHA!!
Not.
History is just too damn ugly regarding what happens when a group of people are considered “non-human...”
Yeah, these are tough times we’re livin’ in. I know that in your mind you were just jokin’ around, but saying “we should infect all the prisoners”... well, to use your words, that’s “careless and grotesque.”You sound rather put out. Perhaps even victimized by my careless words and grotesque manner?
I detect a strong scent of huffiness on your digital breath good sir.
.
get used to it, especially once the military start invading your cities.
.