- Joined
- Jan 16, 2013
- Messages
- 23,665
- Name
- Dennis

plenty of other threads regarding TA
And there is nothing like a good T&A thread.
plenty of other threads regarding TA
Yes, we definitely have an ugly 2nd half schedule. Totally agree.
My only point is that we seem to have caught teams at or achieving their high point (like AZ having "discovered" a rejuvenated AP...dammit).
So, to be 4-2 like this... that's really special and bodes well for the woodchipper of a schedule we're facing...
Dilly DillyAnd there is nothing like a good T&A thread.
Worst play by play I've endured since that gal who called the Raiders preseason game. :fuelfire::deadhorse:
I’m afraid Watkins fits the woods role and isn’t suited for the burner.
Personally, I think trying to force the ball to Watkins almost cost us an interception when Goff had Kupp open. Watkins also dropped a third down pass early in this game. Goff and Watkins need to get on the same page deep, as they're always just a few inches off. But I'm not really feeling like we need to get Watkins going. I think our offense functions well even without him going.
I also wonder if Watkins knows the entirety of the scheme yet. It seemed like Kupp had to set him straight on a couple of audibles. And when he didn't have a WR to set him straight, he seemed confused about what he was supposed to do.
I would love to get Watkins going, especially deep. But I don't want us forcing anything to him.
I wish McVay would have stuck more with the run
That is an interesting thought.
The offense didn't function that well today. Wanted to see a replay of the drop. I don't about the Watkins knowing the scheme or was it Goff changing the play and hearing it. Goff was changing and calling out plays at the line. Looked like Goff missed the long ball to Watkins when he was open. Threw to the wrong shoulder and as the announces said Goff would want that one back as he had time to make a good throw. I don't see many designed plays outside of the long ones to Watkins like they have to Goff and Woods.
Yeah! Can you believe McVay calling only 4 more run plays than pass plays throughout the game? ...totally out of control....
He doesn't make that mush money, I am looking at the draft pick.Yes, it's not my money, so I'm cool. I don't really care. Can we stop talking about salary though? I know people get paid more than me at work that do half the job, it's out of my control and I let it be.
I saw roughly 100 yards of passing left on the field today. I didn't mind the calls, and don't really care that they didn't connect either. There were opportunities that McVay saw, and tried to capitalize on. Once this team masters the lost art of execution, we can truly pick our shots out there.We gashed them on the ground while the passing offense struggled. On that last drive, McVay seemed to get away from the need to throw the ball, and we just walked it down the field using the run game. But earlier in the game, we'd have Gurley post a few good runs in a row, and then we'd throw the ball three times in a row.
Frankly, if we had run the ball 30 times today to 10 passes, I wouldn't have had an issue with it. We were eating in the run game.
I saw roughly 100 yards of passing left on the field today. I didn't mind the calls, and don't really care that they didn't connect either. There were opportunities that McVay saw, and tried to capitalize on. Once this team masters the lost art of execution, we can truly pick our shots out there.
Possibly. There were a couple of times where I wished they had passed instead of run too.I just felt like we stalled multiple drives by not letting our run game grind it down the field.
Possibly. There were a couple of times where I wished they had passed instead of run too.
All-in-all, not a badly called game by McVay, IMO.