CBA deal progressing

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.

kurtfaulk

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Sep 7, 2011
Messages
16,052

CGI_Ram

Hamburger Connoisseur
Moderator
Joined
Jun 28, 2010
Messages
48,216
Name
Burger man
NFL and NLPA will meet following CBA vote

While nearly all major sports leagues have either suspended or canceled upcoming events, the NFL has yet to make any drastic changes to their offseason schedule. Obviously, unlike most other leagues, that are currently in season, the NFL lacks the same pressure since their largest public events (e.g. NFL Draft, Training Camp, etc.) are still at least a month away, but as the COVID-19 (a.k.a coronavirus) epidemic has reached the level of a global pandemic, it has become clearer that even the NFL will be impacted.

According to Mark Maske of The Washington Post, the NFL and NFLPA will meet on Sunday to discuss short and long-term plans for the offseason in reaction to the virus. Furthermore, Maske notes that free agency, at least at the moment, appears set to stay on schedule, however, there seems to be a real possibility offseason workouts are delayed.

While free agency does not require travel from players, agents, and teams, it does seem peculiar to try and continue business as usual amidst such abnormal circumstances. Mike Klis of 9News pointed out on Twitterthat “there are competitive disadvantages for teams that have shut down their buildings.” It’s also reasonable to expect members from all around the NFL community to contract the virus. Owners, front-office employees, coaches, agents, and players are all at risk and one wonders if as soon as one person is diagnosed with COVID-19 the league will suspend operation (much in the way the NBA reacted to Rudy Gobert’s diagnosis).

Another complicating factor for the league is the ongoing CBA negotiations between the NFL and NFLPA. The NFLPA is currently voting on the league’s proposal and both sides may be more willing to delay the offseason if the deal is ratified. Granted, there are a number of critics and arguments in opposition of the deal as well.
 

den-the-coach

Fifty-four Forty or Fight
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jan 16, 2013
Messages
22,505
Name
Dennis
I hope the results don't take as long as the Iowa Democratic Caucus did.
 

Angry Ram

Captain RAmerica Original Rammer
Joined
Jul 1, 2010
Messages
17,904
Yessir, wasn't worried from the get go.

Well, hopefully we still have a football season though.
 

OldSchool

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Nov 3, 2013
Messages
39,085
So now that it's approved lets play the guessing role as we usually do around here. What are the next big issues for each side? I'd wager owners want to go to 18 games and players want more guaranteed money in contracts.
 

den-the-coach

Fifty-four Forty or Fight
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jan 16, 2013
Messages
22,505
Name
Dennis
So now that it's approved lets play the guessing role as we usually do around here. What are the next big issues for each side? I'd wager owners want to go to 18 games and players want more guaranteed money in contracts.

I believe players want the revenue to go from 48.5 to 50% and then you will get your 18 games with two preseason games.
 

Ram65

Legend
Joined
Apr 30, 2015
Messages
9,632
That was a close vote. I thought it would have passed with a wider margin. Oh well, it's done and now we can move on to free agency and the draft.
 

OldSchool

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Nov 3, 2013
Messages
39,085
I believe players want the revenue to go from 48.5 to 50% and then you will get your 18 games with two preseason games.
I could see that and it likely comes down to a split like this year. More share of the revenue benefits the lower end almost as much as the upper end of the payroll spectrum. More guaranteed money benefits the upper end more.
 

OldSchool

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Nov 3, 2013
Messages
39,085
That was a close vote. I thought it would have passed with a wider margin. Oh well, it's done and now we can move on to free agency and the draft.
This CBA was 100% the haves vs the have not in the union.
 

MadGoat

Mathematically alive
Joined
Jul 31, 2016
Messages
1,909
I believe players want the revenue to go from 48.5 to 50% and then you will get your 18 games with two preseason games.
By the time the CBA expires in 2030, we'll have a pretty good idea of the impact of adding the additional game. How that impacts player health will probably determine if they try for another regular season game in 2030.

By then, McVay's revolutionary strategy of resting his starters until week 3 of the regular season will have taken hold across the league... :ROFLMAO:
 

den-the-coach

Fifty-four Forty or Fight
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jan 16, 2013
Messages
22,505
Name
Dennis
This CBA was 100% the haves vs the have not in the union.

IMO, I believe the vote was going to be "No", however, the events of the week with the COVID-19 and the market made players think, this was as good as it was going to get presently.
 

Ram65

Legend
Joined
Apr 30, 2015
Messages
9,632
This CBA was 100% the haves vs the have not in the union.


So true. I thought the have nots percentage was 65% of the union which should have made it pass by a wider margin. I think the haves got to the have nots and persuaded some to vote no which is apparent from the numbers. The haves should have started to create strike fund accounts much earlier for the have nots. Had they done so they could have stopped the deal from passing. They should have put their money where their mouths were.