Elmgrovegnome with his own blind spot:
I really think you are overlooking one fact. The Rams window is beginning to open. They have a shaky Bradford to rely on, to carry them through the next few years of potential NFL dominance with the current defense getting even better. If they don't have a QB to score a few points they don't win. Cutler wouldn't have to score 34 pts a game with the Rams defense so his job just got easier. However, if they don't get an NFL quality starter to carry them through the next few years they may miss their best opportunity in years to win a Superbowl. We are not talking about Cutler on a 10 year contract here. Just a two or three year contract until the Rams can find a viable young starter.
He would be a stop gap. He would be insurance to make sure that this rebuild that has finally arrived does not go for naught.
I think what you're overlooking is that I agree with everything you just said in this post. Although not everything you've said in this conversation.
There's one aspect in this little scenario where we differ and one where I think you're feet aren't that firmly on the ground.
Where we differ is in how much we're willing to spend (not how long his contract would be for but more on that in a second) on this stopgap QB. I'm not willing to spend more than 8 million or so for a plan 1B.
Where I think you're having a a really nice dream is in thinking Cutler would go for your plan. You tell me what you'd be willing to spend, guaranteed and not guaranteed and how long the contract would be for. I'll bet you $10,000,000 ROD bucks that he gets offered more than that. Or you'll give me figures we could never afford in the first place. Why would he take any offer that A) was only for 2-3 years and B) wasn't for market prices? The other teams that would be our competitors for his services don't have
any plan 1A like we do.
I like your plan.

Make it so Elmgrovegnome! :bow: