Elmgrovegnome
Legend
- Joined
- Jan 23, 2013
- Messages
- 23,249
Good enough to get signed by a SB contender?
Finally its over. Now they can resign Tim Barnes.
Good enough to get signed by a SB contender?
Oh my God. I think it just moved..... You know "IT"Plus, Bernie has bigger tits. Much bigger.
Whoop. "IT" just moved againWhat side of the Ball was that "Wang" player? Can we sign him at Center?
I wouldn't be celebrating Austin's arrival. He has a huge problem getting his pad level underneath pass rushers, anchoring to establish power, using proper leverage, and being a second or too late on his blocks. This has led to Blythe getting pushed back into the quarterback.For the Chiefs this is an interesting signing. Austin Reiter, C, has not resigned. This may be his replacement. Reiter offers more in pass pro but is not good in the run game. It sounds like these two are pretty similar.
With Joe Thuney and Kyle Long lining up at G that may free up the C to go to the second level more. Blythe looks pretty mobile. Like you guys said he's undersized.
I wouldn't be celebrating Austin's arrival. He has a huge problem getting his pad level underneath pass rushers, anchoring to establish power, using proper leverage, and being a second or too late on his blocks. This has led to Blythe getting pushed back into the quarterback.
It's no secret he's not a stout center and teams would pass rush and run blitz over center. It's why McVay called so many designed rollouts for Goff to neutralize Blythe getting beaten. It looks like that was KCs weakness in the Superbowl. I can't foresee AB improving that weakness.
It wouldn't shock me if KC traded back a few spots to grab a center in the draft or maybe just take your number 1 rated center on the board to protect your investment in Mahomes.
Blythe already has two other centers to compete with in KC. Being cheap the Chiefs may see him as a backup.
Which is exactly what I said in what you quoted. You settle for him when you can't get something better. He's not terrible but calling him good also wouldn't be accurate. A question for you though. After Noteboom went down who was the weak link in the OL? I'd wager the vast majority of responses from Rams fans and fans of teams we played would be Blythe.
Yes they are because each position you cited puts twice as many people on the field. Also each of those positions have a rotation of up to 5 or 6 people at times each where as you put 5 OL out for a game unless somebody gets hurt. There's no comparison.
It will be interesting to see the money he fetched. If he is being paid as a backup, we should have kept him. He brings great depth on the line, is capable of playing multiple positions, and knows the system. Many people wanted an upgrade at C - myself included - but even as a non-ideal starter, you could find worse. Every team has weak spots in a cap world. If it's a low value deal, I will assume Blythe just wanted to move on, as one would like to think the Rams would have matched if he was being paid a backup-level salary.
Man, its brutal on Twitter, serves him right
View: https://twitter.com/yusuf25764672/status/1376993505348874245?s=20
View: https://twitter.com/VKingofthenorth/status/1377293213715734530?s=20
View: https://twitter.com/OgElias31/status/1377286510500798468?s=20
View: https://twitter.com/VikingNation28/status/1377019253996597250?s=20
View: https://twitter.com/patsfanbeantown/status/1376991757640953858?s=20
Yep. Sounds like they had no intent on signing him as a starter. Perhaps they offered a backup role didn’t want to pay much for that.Man, Blythe obviously wasn't a priority for the Rams if he signed that cheap.
Here comes the Brian Allen train