iced said:LesBaker said:When I see posts about hiring Martz I giggle. Bradford couldn't handle that shyte it's not his skill set.
He would poop his pants by halftime. Only Warner could QB that.
how do you figure?
bradford's supposed strong suit is the spread offense - sounds like a logical fit for martz
BobCarl said:Thank you Mr. Carpé Diem ... Yawn.LesBaker said:Only Warner
LesBaker said:iced said:LesBaker said:When I see posts about hiring Martz I giggle. Bradford couldn't handle that shyte it's not his skill set.
He would poop his pants by halftime. Only Warner could QB that.
how do you figure?
bradford's supposed strong suit is the spread offense - sounds like a logical fit for martz
Those two things are not the same thing at all.
The reasons Bradford couldn't run Martz' O are plenty.
First we don't even know how good he is at reading defenses and that's a big part of why he struggled in McDaniels O he wasn't making the right line calls plus in college he only "read" half the field per play from a report I read.
Then there is his accuracy.....it would be a real problem in that type of precise route/timing O, he be an INT machine LOL. Especially on the 12-25 yard stuff.
And durability.....I'm not sure Bradford could take the hits after releasing though in today's NFL that would be less of a problem than it was from 99-01 when Warner was getting hit just after the release all game long.
Bradford is a different type of QB. MaxQ is not his game.
Thordaddy said:LesBaker said:iced said:LesBaker said:When I see posts about hiring Martz I giggle. Bradford couldn't handle that shyte it's not his skill set.
He would poop his pants by halftime. Only Warner could QB that.
how do you figure?
bradford's supposed strong suit is the spread offense - sounds like a logical fit for martz
Those two things are not the same thing at all.
The reasons Bradford couldn't run Martz' O are plenty.
First we don't even know how good he is at reading defenses and that's a big part of why he struggled in McDaniels O he wasn't making the right line calls plus in college he only "read" half the field per play from a report I read.
Then there is his accuracy.....it would be a real problem in that type of precise route/timing O, he be an INT machine LOL. Especially on the 12-25 yard stuff.
And durability.....I'm not sure Bradford could take the hits after releasing though in today's NFL that would be less of a problem than it was from 99-01 when Warner was getting hit just after the release all game long.
Bradford is a different type of QB. MaxQ is not his game.
Les you need to read up on Martz offense he developed it for a QB who was almost blind,the reason Warner was benched was FOR reading defenses and worrying about ints So I don't think Sam can't run an offense John Kitna can run, just sayin
Thordaddy said:LesBaker said:iced said:LesBaker said:When I see posts about hiring Martz I giggle. Bradford couldn't handle that shyte it's not his skill set.
He would poop his pants by halftime. Only Warner could QB that.
how do you figure?
bradford's supposed strong suit is the spread offense - sounds like a logical fit for martz
Those two things are not the same thing at all.
The reasons Bradford couldn't run Martz' O are plenty.
First we don't even know how good he is at reading defenses and that's a big part of why he struggled in McDaniels O he wasn't making the right line calls plus in college he only "read" half the field per play from a report I read.
Then there is his accuracy.....it would be a real problem in that type of precise route/timing O, he be an INT machine LOL. Especially on the 12-25 yard stuff.
And durability.....I'm not sure Bradford could take the hits after releasing though in today's NFL that would be less of a problem than it was from 99-01 when Warner was getting hit just after the release all game long.
Bradford is a different type of QB. MaxQ is not his game.
Les you need to read up on Martz offense he developed it for a QB who was almost blind,the reason Warner was benched was FOR reading defenses and worrying about ints So I don't think Sam can't run an offense John Kitna can run, just sayin
LesBaker said:And durability.....I'm not sure Bradford could take the hits after releasing though in today's NFL that would be less of a problem than it was from 99-01 when Warner was getting hit just after the release all game long.
That's me kind to a faultSelassie I said:Bulger a twig ? That's being kind...
![]()
I tend to agree with you on your entire post.EastRam said:First me doesn't think Fisher is going anywhere anytime soon. He will get all five seasons.
Now for Martz.
Martzs greatest success came with DV due to DV being a stubborn strong HC. Just like Fisher.
Martz cannot be successful as the man in charge. Thats not his skill set. Martz best run from 99 to 01 was due to DV and the strong front office that DV built. And yes the players. Once the strong HC (DV) left the worm started to turn very very slowly. Martz was able to keep it going with what DV built in 01 by hiring Lovie. After Lovie left and the front office begin its stupid power grabbing shyte the worm started to flip.
With Martz in Det, San Fran and da Bears. None of those teams has strong HC's and all three Retooled their front office when moving on from Martz.
My point being is Martz is at his best "with" a strong HC and front office in place. Martz as HC? no way. Martz as OC with Fisher in charge would be a great team.
History shows as much.
You always are correct ...like a few weeks ago when you claim that Al Davis didn't want to trade to pick Donnie Avery in 2008 ... yet a reliable source in the Raiders War room during the draft said otherwise.LesBaker said:BobCarl said:Thank you Mr. Carpé Diem ... Yawn.LesBaker said:Only Warner
Whatever, my point is correct.
If it's about the poster, refrain from posting it.BobCarl said:You always are correct ...like a few weeks ago when you claim that Al Davis didn't want to trade to pick Donnie Avery in 2008 ... yet a reliable source in the Raiders War room during the draft said otherwise.LesBaker said:BobCarl said:Thank you Mr. Carpé Diem ... Yawn.LesBaker said:Only Warner
Whatever, my point is correct.
"Warner is the answer,Warner is the Answer ... Warner is the answer."
that was a decade ago ... lets move on
why is it ok for him to do it on other threads?X said:If it's about the poster, refrain from posting it.
If you have an issue with what the owner has to say please pm him and take it privateBobCarl said:why is it ok for him to do it on other threads?X said:If it's about the poster, refrain from posting it.
Rabid Ram said:If you have an issue with what the owner has to say please pm him and take it privateBobCarl said:why is it ok for him to do it on other threads?X said:If it's about the poster, refrain from posting it.
How about this? Everybody stop playing moderator and just concentrate on posting about football.BobCarl said:Rabid Ram said:If you have an issue with what the owner has to say please pm him and take it privateBobCarl said:why is it ok for him to do it on other threads?X said:If it's about the poster, refrain from posting it.
and why wasn't your message in private? I didn't know that Les Baker was the owner of the board ... my bad.