Rabid Ram
Legend
- Joined
- Mar 13, 2013
- Messages
- 7,360
- Name
- Dustin
Everytime it's brought up it a big debate with no middle groundX said:Huh?Thordaddy said:I guess Martz = gun control on a football board
Everytime it's brought up it a big debate with no middle groundX said:Huh?Thordaddy said:I guess Martz = gun control on a football board
Hmm. I'm not getting that vibe. Seems pretty civil to me. :idk:Rabid Ram said:Everytime it's brought up it a big debate with no middle groundX said:Huh?Thordaddy said:I guess Martz = gun control on a football board
I think so so as well. Just trying to dichipher the meaning as well.X said:Hmm. I'm not getting that vibe. Seems pretty civil to me. :idk:Rabid Ram said:Everytime it's brought up it a big debate with no middle groundX said:Huh?Thordaddy said:I guess Martz = gun control on a football board
Yeah, but we need more than alright right now. When you have the Greatest Show on Turf alright is passable, but right now alright would have us right about where we were before things started falling apart. A run of a mill team that was nothing special and couldn't really take that next big step.Lesson said:IMO, if the FO didn't hate Martz nor draft poorly, he'd still be in St. Louis. Martz with a competent personnel guy(Charlie Armey) was alright. But with Zygmunt and Shaw, shit went down hill.
They also have exactly zero rings without Giunta, Vermeil or the equipment manager.fearsomefour said:Martz was great at a couple of things....developing QBs for one. He had Trent Green (7th rounder), Warner (undrafted), Bulger (7th round....I think) and some journeyment like Hill and Kitna. He makes QBs succeed. The rub is they have to succeed his way. I love Martz and I believe the Rams have exactly zero rings without him....but there is zero chance he comes back.
Like Chip Kelly? I wonder if that offense is going to catch on.bluecoconuts said:I'd rather some fresh young blood.
brokeu91 said:Martz could come up with ways to use the weapons that we have (Cook, Austin).
Thordaddy said:I guess Martz = gun control on a football board
At the moment it is, my point was JUST the mention of the name starts debate over crystallized positions.Rabid Ram said:I think so so as well. Just trying to dichipher the meaning as well.X said:Hmm. I'm not getting that vibe. Seems pretty civil to me. :idk:Rabid Ram said:Everytime it's brought up it a big debate with no middle groundX said:Huh?Thordaddy said:I guess Martz = gun control on a football board
That was one of the points I was trying to make with an earlier post I wrote in this thread.EastRam said:First me doesn't think Fisher is going anywhere anytime soon. He will get all five seasons.
Now for Martz.
Martzs greatest success came with DV due to DV being a stubborn strong HC. Just like Fisher.
Martz cannot be successful as the man in charge. Thats not his skill set. Martz best run from 99 to 01 was due to DV and the strong front office that DV built. And yes the players. Once the strong HC (DV) left the worm started to turn very very slowly. Martz was able to keep it going with what DV built in 01 by hiring Lovie. After Lovie left and the front office begin its stupid power grabbing shyte the worm started to flip.
With Martz in Det, San Fran and da Bears. None of those teams has strong HC's and all three Retooled their front office when moving on from Martz.
My point being is Martz is at his best "with" a strong HC and front office in place. Martz as HC? no way. Martz as OC with Fisher in charge would be a great team.
History shows as much.