- Joined
- Jan 6, 2014
- Messages
- 1,741
- Name
- B and G
This. I don't think Spags was a good coach because he wasn't a good strategist and had no idea how to run an offense, but he was pretty well liked by his players iirc. Scott Linehan otoh...I don't remember Spags being disliked by the Organization, or by any of the players.
The equipment manager, sure. But even guys like Bernie and Balzer went to bat for Spags.
This:
Many Bills players didn’t like him, according to sources. That fact alone doesn’t mean much considering that disciplinarians often aren’t beloved by everyone in the locker room. However, Marrone’s lack of people skills rubbed many co-workers the wrong way. He took a coarse tack that wasn’t well-received in the building, according to sources.
Isn't a valid parallel, IMO.
I just agreed with micromanager part. Did you guys see when they showed him coaching the Ravens players on the sidelines last night? I had real high hopes for him after his D held the Cheatriots to 14 in the Super Bowl.
It was more thjan the equipment manager, it was the travel manager, the security manager, it was the alumni director and the pubnlic relations director. Spags dictated how the socks were handed out, how lamps were placed, what pictures were on the wall, and he cancelled the scouting contract with the group that had really helped Vermeil. It was also the head trainer and the assistant trainer . He also disconnected with lots of alumni.I don't remember Spags being disliked by the Organization, or by any of the players.
The equipment manager, sure. But even guys like Bernie and Balzer went to bat for Spags.
This:
Many Bills players didn’t like him, according to sources. That fact alone doesn’t mean much considering that disciplinarians often aren’t beloved by everyone in the locker room. However, Marrone’s lack of people skills rubbed many co-workers the wrong way. He took a coarse tack that wasn’t well-received in the building, according to sources.
Isn't a valid parallel, IMO.
Marrone walked, Spags was fired. Pretty sure it was the 10-38 thing.
Yeah, I remember some subservient changes too, and not permitting guys like Hanifan to wander around the weight room. All that did was piss off the people who got fired. The head trainer is still the head trainer, so it had to have been a good hire, yeah? The article you posted spoke about the higher ups in the Organization and players who disliked the coach to a toxic level. I don't recall that being an issue here with Spags. Countless discussions with Demoff and player interviews (except for Karney, lol) pretty much showed that he was well received around Rams Park. If the idea that he was a control freak or given too much power is the issue, then okay. But that wasn't the reason he was let go. According to Demoff, all he had to do was win about 4 or 5 more games in 2011 and he would have still been the coach. There wasn't any motivation to get him out of the building otherwise.It was more thjan the equipment manager, it was the travel manager, the security manager, it was the alumni director and the pubnlic relations director. Spags dictated how the socks were handed out, how lamps were placed, what pictures were on the wall, and he cancelled the scouting contract with the group that had really helped Vermeil. It was also the head trainer and the assistant trainer . He also disconnected with lots of alumni.
And all those people were canned for a coach who had never been a head coach on any level. He was given too much power, it's not like rams were bringing in Bill Parcells or someone with gravitas. And Spags was disliked by many people. The building was toxic. And that changed under Fish.
But that wasn't the reason he was let go. According to Demoff, all he had to do was win about 4 or 5 more games in 2011 and he would have still been the coach. They wasn't any motivation to get him out of the building otherwise.
If Brady didn't have a fucked up ankle the Giants would have lost that game IMO. He could barely walk.
Still not sure if ANYONE coaching was going to win 4 or 5 more games than the Rams did in 2011. Too many injuries concentrated onto the CBs and OL and thus too many people starting games who weren't even on a roster on opening day.Yeah, I remember some subservient changes too, and not permitting guys like Hanifan to wander around the weight room. All that did was pee pee off the people who got fired. The head trainer is still the head trainer, so it had to have been a good hire, yeah? The article you posted spoke about the higher ups in the Organization and players who disliked the coach to a toxic level. I don't recall that being an issue here with Spags. Countless discussions with Demoff and player interviews (except for Karney, lol) pretty much showed that he was well received around Rams Park. If the idea that he was a control freak or given too much power is the issue, then okay. But that wasn't the reason he was let go. According to Demoff, all he had to do was win about 4 or 5 more games in 2011 and he would have still been the coach. There wasn't any motivation to get him out of the building otherwise.
Yeah, he answered that in one of our chats with him. [LINK]Really? I figured as such, to be quite honest. I understand 2011 was a complete freakshow with regards to the personnel being required to play, but I felt that some players-I'll use Al Harris as an example-prevented other players from being on the field that were younger. If the roster hadn't gone from like one of the youngest to one of the oldest, I could have seen Spags getting another year if they'd been able to win a little more with young players.
Probably not, but he probably could have won a couple more if they played as inspired as they did against the Saints that year. It's gotta be pretty hard keeping an entire team focused when the whole complexion of the team changes from week to week. I do remember guys like Laurinaitis and Long being constantly upbeat and focused as the year went along, and that's a testament to coaching, no doubt. In the end, though, we owe him debt of gratitude, because there wouldn't have been a blockbuster trade on the table the following year if they DID go 8-8, yeah? lol.Still not sure if ANYONE coaching was going to win 4 or 5 more games than the Rams did in 2011. Too many injuries concentrated onto the CBs and OL and thus too many people starting games who weren't even on a roster on opening day.
Yeah, I remember some subservient changes too, and not permitting guys like Hanifan to wander around the weight room. All that did was pee pee off the people who got fired. The head trainer is still the head trainer, so it had to have been a good hire, yeah? The article you posted spoke about the higher ups in the Organization and players who disliked the coach to a toxic level. I don't recall that being an issue here with Spags. Countless discussions with Demoff and player interviews (except for Karney, lol) pretty much showed that he was well received around Rams Park. If the idea that he was a control freak or given too much power is the issue, then okay. But that wasn't the reason he was let go. According to Demoff, all he had to do was win about 4 or 5 more games in 2011 and he would have still been the coach. There wasn't any motivation to get him out of the building otherwise.