Londoner
Twitchy sophomore.
- Joined
- Apr 29, 2023
- Messages
- 2,416
Not necessarily. Your second best LG, say, might only be your sixth (or lower) best lineman overall.Which is how you end up with your best 5
Not necessarily. Your second best LG, say, might only be your sixth (or lower) best lineman overall.Which is how you end up with your best 5
That’s Grape Ape to you.I haven't picked on the mauve ape in a while....*notes*
I don't know...but the mauve monkey might be catchy!That’s Grape Ape to you.
Why’d you look straight at me while saying that?Got it: no more making sense.
I’ll just post a load of bollocks, like all the veterans on this forum.
I just don't get the Xavier thing. The only thing I have seen him do positive was catch that pass from Bennet. He has made zero plays in the return game. I would start trying running backs in the return. See if they can handle the fielding punts. Please, Please stop using Kupp.WR is likely these guys if they e keep 6 or 7
Kupp
VJ
TuTu
Puca
BS
Robinson
I think it could come to Xavier or Tyler if the go 7 TJ is a better receiver but X has the ability to play teams.
Injuries have Kept the best 5 OL from playing together in pre season and I am not 100 that was ever the plan
I think that his ST experience is what gives him a shot, I agree in that I don't see much from him as a WRI just don't get the Xavier thing. The only thing I have seen him do positive was catch that pass from Bennet. He has made zero plays in the return game. I would start trying running backs in the return. See if they can handle the fielding punts. Please, Please stop using Kupp.
Just semantics I guess, but soft is saying he plays weak and gets pushed around. If that is what you mean, my bad and never mind. Brittle might be a better term for Boom. Someone who always gets hurt. IE Bradford.Boom was decent against the Bucks because they had zero pass rushers, and played the run extremely well. So I wouldn't use that as a barometer. Every time boom has given an opportunity to be the starter he's gotten injured. I'm not talking about filling in for a couple of games. He either has extremely bad luck or is in-fact soft.
Haven't seen much in ST either.I think that his ST experience is what gives him a shot, I agree in that I don't see much from him as a WR
This might helpI have a few issues that have me scratching my balls.
Act like you’ve been there.You’re allowed to be new around here, you just can’t act like you’re new around here.
Me neither. I want the 5 lineman who are going to work together the best.This “Best 5 linemen” on the OL really gets on my nerves.
I don’t want the best five overall linemen to start games
"Ballocks"? You Brits really need to learn to speak proper English!Got it: no more making sense.
I’ll just post a load of bollocks, like all the veterans on this forum.
Patriots already cut him, when he failed their physical.
Yeah, Stop Making Sense! *Got it: no more making sense.
I’ll just post a load of bollocks, like all the veterans on this forum.
FWIW, I posted the above OP on another board before reading Jourdan’s piece today. I later imported that post to this board.So you read Jourdan’s latest piece on the OL (“Rams’ ‘best 5’ O-linemen still aren’t playing together — and that could be a problem”) and you’re repackaging it as your own original thoughts/concerns?
It's bawls...I have a few issues that have me scratching my balls.