Well Steven Jackson for all his greatness was no Marshall Faulk, not to mention the crap teams he was on compared to Marshall.
Recent top 5-10 running backs Saquon Barkley and Christian McCaffrey were drafted by BAD teams and had no impact, then went to GOOD teams and won a Super Bowl and came within a hair of winning a Super Bowl respectively. Love would be joining a GOOD team IMMEDIATELY on a Rookie Contract to boot. The possibilities are endless.
Barkley and McCaffrey are at the very least, Hall of Very Good, if not borderline HOFers. Again, that's even assuming that Love is as good as they are. To compare him to Faulk in any way is
distasteful to Faulk, his accomplishments, and the hype around Love. You have
no idea that he'll even
be that good, and to say he will is presumptuous.
Running backs get injured a lot. Running backs get wear and tear. Running backs can be ineffective. Running backs don't matter as much as you think they do.
San Fran won with more than just McCaffrey (prime Deebo, Aiyuk in his prime, a great all-around defense, and a rookie quarterback whose weaknesses weren't figured out at the time) and the overall cost - giving up valuable picks, seeing McCaffrey injured a ton and likely declining - made it a fool's cost.
Philly won on the strength of an elite defense, an elite O-line, and Hurts having more than just Barkley as a weapon (or do A.J. Brown, DeVonta Smith, and Dallas Goedert no longer count?). Now they're paying Barkley out the ass through his declining years, and they're having to cut valuable roster players because of it.
Running backs are useful, but they're also the single most expendable roster position - and you're wanting us to trade
Jared fucking Verse for the opportunity to draft a running back who
might be good. The possibility for failure on multiple fronts is just as endless.