OFFICIAL 2024 NFL News: Trades, cuts, free agency, and more

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.

kurtfaulk

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Sep 7, 2011
Messages
16,791
.

Stupid DNA rifle.

Why is it only innocent people die or get injured when these Fuckwits get behind the wheel?

.
 

Merlin

Damn the torpedoes
Rams On Demand Sponsor
ROD Credit | 2023 TOP Member
Joined
May 8, 2014
Messages
41,008
Yeah Rams wouldn't do that. But it would be an insane bookend duo. Tackles would be shitting their pants every week facing those two.
 

Psycho_X

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jan 14, 2013
Messages
12,336
We need an elite CB not a 34 year old OLBer. Unless he wants to chase a ring, sign for peanuts, and be a rotation piece behind Young that would be a hard no.
 

PhillyRam

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jun 1, 2013
Messages
7,366
Name
Scott
We need an elite CB not a 34 year old OLBer. Unless he wants to chase a ring, sign for peanuts, and be a rotation piece behind Young that would be a hard no.
Give me DJ Reed, Tee Higgins, and Alaric Jackson and I am done with FA, outside of your 2nd & 3rd wave type cheap deals to plug holes.

With about $55M in cap, and some other possible savings from some roster/ contract restructures, we should have plenty to do that.

Hopefully they can do this without franchise tagging Jackson so he has a lower cap number for next year.
 

DzRams

Starter
Joined
Mar 12, 2024
Messages
910
Name
Desmal M
Give me DJ Reed, Tee Higgins, and Alaric Jackson and I am done with FA, outside of your 2nd & 3rd wave type cheap deals to plug holes.

With about $55M in cap, and some other possible savings from some roster/ contract restructures, we should have plenty to do that.

Hopefully they can do this without franchise tagging Jackson so he has a lower cap number for next year.
This is my exact dream free agency plan. It worked out on Overthecap's salary cap calculator too.
 

PhillyRam

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jun 1, 2013
Messages
7,366
Name
Scott
This is my exact dream free agency plan. It worked out on Overthecap's salary cap calculator too.
I initially wasn't big on Higgins, but I didn't realize he was only 25 yrs old. I think I was confusing him with another former Clemson guy, Mike Williams.

So despite his injury history, that isn't great, at 25 yrs old, he would be worth the gamble.
 

DzRams

Starter
Joined
Mar 12, 2024
Messages
910
Name
Desmal M
I initially wasn't big on Higgins, but I didn't realize he was only 25 yrs old. I think I was confusing him with another former Clemson guy, Mike Williams.

So despite his injury history, that isn't great, at 25 yrs old, he would be worth the gamble.
His injury history isn't great but the Rams haven't had success with drafting the X WR position. And if they roll with Stafford next year they will be trying to win it all, so taking some risk is justified.

I'd still sign either DRob or Tutu on a cheap contract, if possible, and draft a WR or two. Even if they sign Higgins they'll need depth behind him and Kupp's replacement likely in 2026.
 

PhillyRam

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jun 1, 2013
Messages
7,366
Name
Scott
His injury history isn't great but the Rams haven't had success with drafting the X WR position. And if they roll with Stafford next year they will be trying to win it all, so taking some risk is justified.

I'd still sign either DRob or Tutu on a cheap contract, if possible, and draft a WR or two. Even if they sign Higgins they'll need depth behind him and Kupp's replacement likely in 2026.
Yep, 2025 is an all in year.
 

hotanez

NRA Member for Life
Joined
Jun 17, 2014
Messages
7,709
Give me DJ Reed, Tee Higgins, and Alaric Jackson and I am done with FA, outside of your 2nd & 3rd wave type cheap deals to plug holes.

With about $55M in cap, and some other possible savings from some roster/ contract restructures, we should have plenty to do that.

Hopefully they can do this without franchise tagging Jackson so he has a lower cap number for next year.
fuck if the Rams could make that happen it would be a dream come true.
 

Merlin

Damn the torpedoes
Rams On Demand Sponsor
ROD Credit | 2023 TOP Member
Joined
May 8, 2014
Messages
41,008
The Rams have Byron Young. There's no need to throw money at DE. I'd rather they'd address corner and WR.
Well like I said the Rams wouldn't do that. And I'd prioritize another route as well. But there's a big difference between Young and Mack. And as it pertains to pairings if we had Verse & Mack on the edges that is an elite pairing, which would have been impossible to imagine just a year ago.

Just kicking these things around tbh. I do like Young, and I appreciate him. He's just not in the class of a guy like Mack and I doubt he'll ever be on par with Sweat either, who is also potentially going to hit the market.
 

Elmgrovegnome

Legend
Joined
Jan 23, 2013
Messages
23,186
Well like I said the Rams wouldn't do that. And I'd prioritize another route as well. But there's a big difference between Young and Mack. And as it pertains to pairings if we had Verse & Mack on the edges that is an elite pairing, which would have been impossible to imagine just a year ago.

Just kicking these things around tbh. I do like Young, and I appreciate him. He's just not in the class of a guy like Mack and I doubt he'll ever be on par with Sweat either, who is also potentially going to hit the market.
Mack’s declining and Young is ascending.

Young has 34 solo tackles - Mack has 20

Young has 28 assists -Mack has 19

QB hits are close Young 13-Mack 15

TFLs Young 12- Mack 6

Sacks Young 7.5 - Mack 6


I don’t see it as an upgrade
 

jrry32

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jan 14, 2013
Messages
30,285
Mack’s declining and Young is ascending.

Young has 34 solo tackles - Mack has 20

Young has 28 assists -Mack has 19

QB hits are close Young 13-Mack 15

TFLs Young 12- Mack 6

Sacks Young 7.5 - Mack 6


I don’t see it as an upgrade
The only way it makes sense is if we sign Mack to be our #3 EDGE and let Hoecht walk. Mack would have to sign a cheap deal. There's value to having him here as a veteran mentor. So I'm not opposed to it. But it doesn't sound like Mack wants to leave the Chargers.
 

Elmgrovegnome

Legend
Joined
Jan 23, 2013
Messages
23,186
The only way it makes sense is if we sign Mack to be our #3 EDGE and let Hoecht walk. Mack would have to sign a cheap deal. There's value to having him here as a veteran mentor. So I'm not opposed to it. But it doesn't sound like Mack wants to leave the Chargers.
Hoecht is so versatile as the third edge and he’s a veteran leader on the team with Super Borl experience.

I’d rather put the resources elsewhere and keep Hoecht if he’s affordable.
 

jrry32

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jan 14, 2013
Messages
30,285
Hoecht is so versatile as the third edge and he’s a veteran leader on the team with Super Borl experience.

I’d rather put the resources elsewhere and keep Hoecht if he’s affordable.
I concur on keeping Hoecht if he's affordable. I also like him a lot.
 

Merlin

Damn the torpedoes
Rams On Demand Sponsor
ROD Credit | 2023 TOP Member
Joined
May 8, 2014
Messages
41,008
Mack’s declining and Young is ascending.

Young has 34 solo tackles - Mack has 20

Young has 28 assists -Mack has 19

QB hits are close Young 13-Mack 15

TFLs Young 12- Mack 6

Sacks Young 7.5 - Mack 6


I don’t see it as an upgrade
In the window that matters, which is 2025 and maybe 2026, the difference between the two is glaring.

Look again I like Young. Nothing against the dude. But this mentality of overvaluing our boys because they're our players is silly.