Add in we play the Hags twice a year, Whiners twice, and now GB and we have a advantage in 5 games at least with the addition of Wagner.The Wagner signing takes on even more importance now that GB may rely more on a running game. GB and SF - two potential playoff opponents that controlling the run is huge for the D.
Agreed that Green Bay took a hit to their passing game. Thing is Rodgers with a good run game, if they can do that, will kill you no matter who is at receiver. Particularly if they have a great defense.Christian Watson an FCS receiver? You are joking I hope.
It seems that Green Bay is going to be more of a running team aka Seattle
Agreed that Green Bay took a hit to their passing game. Thing is Rodgers with a good run game, if they can do that, will kill you no matter who is at receiver. Particularly if they have a great defense.
I've always felt like a great defense is a QB's best friend. Still do. So I think this different version of the Packers is going to be interesting to see vs our new version of the Rams. In terms of chasing that home field and all that.
And it would be nice if that damn division would stand up and give the Packers some trouble.
We’ll see. I think the Packers take a step back. They may make the playoffs but I don’t think they’ll lead the league in wins.Agreed that Green Bay took a hit to their passing game. Thing is Rodgers with a good run game, if they can do that, will kill you no matter who is at receiver. Particularly if they have a great defense.
I've always felt like a great defense is a QB's best friend. Still do. So I think this different version of the Packers is going to be interesting to see vs our new version of the Rams. In terms of chasing that home field and all that.
And it would be nice if that damn division would stand up and give the Packers some trouble.
I think they will take a step back too, in their pass game. But not fully comfortable writing them off as a primary threat for us just yet because they might improve elsewhere.We’ll see. I think the Packers take a step back. They may make the playoffs but I don’t think they’ll lead the league in wins.
If losing Adams is like losing Miller, then signing Wagner is like the Packers trading for Travis Kelce to offset the loss. The Rams have one of the best run stoppers in the league to counter Green Bays move to a more run centric team. Plus you have Seattle and San Francisco, who like to run first. The Packers will always be a threat as long as they have Rodgers, but some of his teeth are pulled.I think they will take a step back too, in their pass game. But not fully comfortable writing them off as a primary threat for us just yet because they might improve elsewhere.
It's sort of like the Rams. Our pass rush is going to be way easier to deal with now that Von's gone. But the secondary will be better this year and we'll be tougher to run on so probably more third and longs.
WTF… early bye, both 49ers games before week 8, and the crummy Seahawks to finish the season. Hardest schedule made worse by the NFL schedulers! What did they use Yahoo’s football scheduler to make it?
11-6 is my guess Go Rams!!!!
We’ll see. I think the Packers take a step back. They may make the playoffs but I don’t think they’ll lead the league in wins.
There is a big big difference between a FCS WR making an impact in the NFL than a other positions like QB and the dumb ass idea to draft someone like Trey Lance.Christian Watson an FCS receiver? You are joking I hope.
It seems that Green Bay is going to be more of a running team aka Seattle
?All I know is GB road 4 years plus in a row. Thankful the 9ers won last year.
?
Don't understand.
Rams have traveled to Green Bay for a regular season game just one time since McVay was hired.