dang
Legend
- Joined
- Mar 15, 2018
- Messages
- 7,800
Let him go t the NYG where it won’t matter for several more years.
View: https://twitter.com/JFowlerESPN/status/1233257180482150400
Because of the the McVay connection, I thought about this as soon as I heard the Redskins were releasing him.
He doesn't fit the profile of a #3 blocking TE/FB. It would make more sense if the Rams were looking to trade Everett, which I'm hoping they don't.
bye bye Everett or Cooks?
I don't think the Rams would move anyone to make room for Reed.bye bye Everett or Cooks?
Nope.bye bye Everett or Cooks?
I don't think the Rams would move anyone to make room for Reed.
It is of course possible they're planning on moving Everett (Cooks isn't going anywhere) and looking at options to not be weak at the position come the draft. But that doesn't make a lot of sense when Reed is so fragile. If he's added it's as a cheap type competition deal IMO. This is probably why they talked to him, to see where he's at in terms of what he's looking for. If it's not affordable I would doubt the Rams are interested.
Why would we trade a young cheap TE so that we could sign a guy with a minimum of 7 concussions and just missed an entire year to the latest one? I really want to understand how getting rid of Everett and adding Reed makes us better.Or, due to higbees emergence and if they are to increase the 2 TE sets, Everett and cooks have become more expendable and they are already thinking of potentially trading Everett and are looking at possible replacements which of course a healthy reed fits the bill.
As for cooks, i love him as a ram but 583 yards and 2 tds in 14 games last year hardly says irreplaceable. Id rather have slay in a trade
Or, due to higbees emergence and if they are to increase the 2 TE sets, Everett and cooks have become more expendable and they are already thinking of potentially trading Everett and are looking at possible replacements which of course a healthy reed fits the bill.
As for cooks, i love him as a ram but 583 yards and 2 tds in 14 games last year hardly says irreplaceable. Id rather have slay in a trade
I can see them move Everett, w/ Reed being a one yr stop gap to pair with Higbee, and they draft another cheap TE in the middle rounds.I don't think the Rams would move anyone to make room for Reed.
It is of course possible they're planning on moving Everett (Cooks isn't going anywhere) and looking at options to not be weak at the position come the draft. But that doesn't make a lot of sense when Reed is so fragile. If he's added it's as a cheap type competition deal IMO. This is probably why they talked to him, to see where he's at in terms of what he's looking for. If it's not affordable I would doubt the Rams are interested.
I can see them move Everett, w/ Reed being a one yr stop gap to pair with Higbee, and they draft another cheap TE in the middle rounds.
Fact is they are not going to be able to keep Everett next yr and he gets hurt too often as well.
So move him and draft another TE to have cheap over the next 4 yrs. Plus, you will get a decent pick for Everett that will actually be used for a more critical position. Then you use a later pick on a TE, unless one of the practice squad guys can develop.
I don't love the move but I agree with @PhillyRam. Signing Reed doesn't count anything against us getting comp picks next year. We will not be resigning Everett and I think past performance has shown he just hasn't been able to break out. Moving him and getting a pick might all be a net positive.
But the concussions scare me.