1. To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.

What is a "true #1 WR"??

Discussion in 'RAMS - NFL TALK' started by blackbart, Mar 8, 2014.

  1. blackbart Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2010
    Messages:
    1,632
    Likes Received:
    850
    And is there one in the Ram's plans for this offense?

    I do not believe there is such a thing in this offense and trying to fit one in would be a mistake.

    The Rams offense is going to be one that is built on a balanced attack running and throwing and distributing the ball to multiple players throughout the year.

    3 main WRs with 5 per game Cook 5 per game other TEs 3-5 per game other WRs 3-5 per game and RBs 3-5 per game. That would be throwing the ball 30-35 times a game which is the way I believe is most likely to produce wins.

    There may be games where individuals are better match up s and the game plan is to get them the ball more but there is no indication that this team wants to throw the ball to the same guy 10-12 times every game.
     
    #1
  2. iced Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2013
    Messages:
    4,382
    Likes Received:
    1,061
    i'll settle for a receiver who can consistently get open and catch the ball - don't see one of those on this roster
     
    #2
    brokeu91 and Boffo97 like this.
  3. Mojo Ram On double secret probation

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2013
    Messages:
    6,587
    Likes Received:
    4,434
    It is the best WR on any given team. Every team has a #1 WR...its just that most of them aren't very good.
     
    #3
    Yamahopper likes this.
  4. The Rammer ESPN Draft Guru

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2011
    Messages:
    2,301
    Likes Received:
    994
    No we dont have a true #1 WR on this team.... I propose we trade the whole 2007 rams draft for Calvin Johnson or Andre Johnson or somebody with a Johnson last name.. What say you?
     
    #4
  5. blackbart Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2010
    Messages:
    1,632
    Likes Received:
    850
    LOL I would rather stay with using multiple players catching the ball and a strong running game
     
    #5
    Angry Ram and The Rammer like this.
  6. RamBill Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2010
    Messages:
    3,420
    Likes Received:
    1,250
    The NFL definition of a #1 WR is one who has to be accounted for on every play....a WR that dictates coverages...defenses roll coverage to his side every time. It's not about stats, it's about how defenses have to adjust to defend him. There aren't 32 #1 WR's in the NFL.
     
    #6
    brokeu91, CGI_Ram and Memphis Ram like this.
  7. The Rammer ESPN Draft Guru

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2011
    Messages:
    2,301
    Likes Received:
    994
    Not saying I didn't like the GSOT days at all but I agree I prefer a Pounding and punishing running game coupled with a Defense that doesn't play nice. That is my kind of football!!! ha
     
    #7
    RamFan503 and blackbart like this.
  8. The Rammer ESPN Draft Guru

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2011
    Messages:
    2,301
    Likes Received:
    994

    To quote Mr. Iced this is what my take of a #1 WR is:

    Reminds me of watching Lions-Cowboys game last year and Lions needed to drive ball down field and everybody knew ball was going to Calvin and he still came away with 1v1 or 1v3 matchups on that drive.
     
    #8
    brokeu91 likes this.
  9. Mojo Ram On double secret probation

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2013
    Messages:
    6,587
    Likes Received:
    4,434
    Right. So its a WR thats very good...and every team wants a WR thats very good. Until we get one who is elite...Tavon Austin or maybe J.Cook is our #1 WR.
     
    #9
  10. blackbart Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2010
    Messages:
    1,632
    Likes Received:
    850
    And that is one of the best things about having multiple players that could be considered your #1. They all have to be accounted for not just 1 guy.
     
    #10
    Faceplant and Mojo Ram like this.
  11. Memphis Ram Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2010
    Messages:
    1,917
    Likes Received:
    1,157
    Amendola had to be accounted for on every play.
    Amendola consistently separated.
    Amendola won 1 on 1 coverage and caught the ball.
    When the game was on the line everyone knew the ball was going to him and he still made plays.

    Perhaps the Rams should bring back Amendola after the Patriots cut him. Or maybe the should let the young guys already on the roster develop as few go-to or #1 WRs get that title within their first couple of NFL seasons. Not even Amendola.
     
    #11
    Last edited: Mar 8, 2014
  12. jjab360 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2013
    Messages:
    3,070
    Likes Received:
    1,974
    I'd be open to that. Bring him back on a cheap contract, already has a great rapport with Bradford, also allows us to use Tavon on the outside where some have speculated he's most effective.
     
    #12
  13. Blue and Gold Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2014
    Messages:
    749
    Likes Received:
    584
    o me the #1 has to be a X or a Z. Not a slot. When Amendola was in the slot . . .yes, what you say is true. But when he tried to play Z . . . he was not as effective, couldn't get off good CBs.

    The #1 WR Rams had was Gibson, from 2010-2012. And he was not a #1 talent. But to be a #1 WR you have to do more than play slot, when you off the line and don't have to face as many double teams or bump corners. Gibson simply couldn't beat good corners. He could beat the average ones.
     
    #13
  14. jjab360 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2013
    Messages:
    3,070
    Likes Received:
    1,974
    So Victor Cruz and T.Y. Hilton aren't no.1 receivers?
     
    #14
  15. Memphis Ram Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2010
    Messages:
    1,917
    Likes Received:
    1,157
    Count me in with the personnel executives that point out that there aren't really that many #1 NFL talents in the entire league. But, I'll just add that having one is not necessary to score a buttload of points, yet I'm perplexed as to why so many seem to believe this team can't succeed without one.
     
    #15
    Faceplant likes this.
  16. rdlkgliders Hugo Bezdek

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2013
    Messages:
    1,874
    Likes Received:
    767
    I believe it is a guy that has to be covered by the number 1 corner, he draws extra attention by involving other defensive players. A number 1 guy is versatile, running routes on the outside and over the middle creating mismatches. He wins nearly all 1 on 1 battles. Most of all defenses game plan around him.
     
    #16
  17. -X- Not into the whole brevity thing.

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2010
    Messages:
    18,787
    Likes Received:
    8,656
    I know one when I see one.
     
    #17
  18. Boffo97 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2014
    Messages:
    3,229
    Likes Received:
    1,978
    Of course a team CAN succeed without one, but even in a more conservative offense, it gives you a huge advantage.
     
    #18
  19. Memphis Ram Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2010
    Messages:
    1,917
    Likes Received:
    1,157
    An advantage? Sure. Huge Advantage? That still depends upon the quality of the player and if his OC and QB can get him the ball. Again, most consider Larry Fitzgerald to be a #1 WR. But, he hasn't been a HUGE advantage for the Cardinals when that wasn't the case.
     
    #19
  20. cgsuddeath Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2013
    Messages:
    142
    Likes Received:
    70
    Sammy Watkins.
     
    #20