Rams reportedly seeking $30M/year stadium naming rights deal

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.

CGI_Ram

Hamburger Connoisseur
Moderator
Joined
Jun 28, 2010
Messages
48,176
Name
Burger man
http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/r...shing-naming-rights-deal-for-new-l-a-stadium/

Rams reportedly seeking record-smashing naming rights deal

If any company out there is hoping to put its name on the Rams' new stadium in Los Angeles, they better run the plan by their accounting department first, because it's not going to be cheap.

As a matter of fact, if the Rams get their way, it will go down as the most expensive naming rights deal in NFL history.

According to the Sports Business Journal, the Rams are seeking a minimum of $30 million per year from any company that's willing to buy the naming rights at the team's new $2.7 billion palace in Inglewood, California.

Not only does the team want $30 million per year, but the Rams also want the deal to run for at least 20 years, which means any potential company looking to purchase the naming rights would have to commit a minimum of $600 million to the team.

rams-stadium-naming-rights-05-05-17.png

The Rams want someone to pay $600 million for the naming rights to their new stadium. HKS Sports & Entertainment

SBJ also noted that the Rams are giving AT&T the first crack at the new stadium's naming rights. Apparently, the Rams are trying to take advantage of the fact that AT&T is trying to beef up its presence on the West Coast, and a $600 million deal would definitely be one way to do that for the telecom company.

To put the Rams' asking price in perspective, AT&T doesn't pay anywhere near $30 million for the naming rights to the Cowboys' stadium in Dallas. According to the New York Times, the company pays between $17 million and $19 million per year to have AT&T Stadium be the official name of Jerry World.

The upside for any company that might decide to drop the $600 million for the naming rights at the Rams' stadium is that their name will be everywhere. The new stadium is scheduled to host Super Bowl LV, and could also eventually host an NFL Draft. Not to mention, there will be two teams playing in the stadium, which means a home game -- and national television coverage -- pretty much every week.

The new stadium is also hoping to one day host the NFL combine and eventually become an off-site home for NFL Network.

The potential 20-year, $600 million deal would also blow out every other stadium naming rights deal that has ever been made in the NFL. The two most recent stadium naming rights deals in the NFL didn't even fetch $600 million combined.

In Atlanta, Mercedes-Benz is paying $324 million over 27 years ($12 million per year) for the naming rights to the Falcons' stadium, which is set to open this season. In Minnesota, U.S. Bank is paying $220 million over 25 years ($8.8 million per year) for naming rights to the Vikings' new stadium, which opened in 2016.

Those two markets don't compare to Los Angeles, though. A better comparison might be Levi's Stadium and MetLife Stadium. In Santa Clara, the 49ers received $220 million over 20 years ($11 million per year) for naming rights, while the Jets and Giants are getting roughly $17 million to $19 million per year from MetLife.

The situation with the Jets and Giants is probably the most comparable since it also involves a stadium being used by two teams.

Basically, if the Rams get what they're asking for, they would blow every other naming rights deal out of the water, and they would get a lot more than what they were going to get in St. Louis.

Before the Rams moved to Los Angeles, National Car Rental committed $158 million over 20 years ($7.9 million per year) for the naming rights on a potential new stadium in St. Louis.
 

Riverumbbq

Angry Progressive
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
May 26, 2013
Messages
11,962
Name
River
Amazon Stadium, ... they can afford it, and I like those kinds of women. :LOL:
 

Faceplant

Still celebrating Superbowl LVI
Rams On Demand Sponsor
2023 ROD Pick'em Champion
Joined
Aug 11, 2010
Messages
9,622
Queue the Kronke bashers.....
 

DaveFan'51

Old-Timer
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Apr 18, 2014
Messages
18,666
Name
Dave
It could also become the Center of Olympic Events in the Future too!!(y);):D
 

kurtfaulk

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Sep 7, 2011
Messages
16,004
.

I'm seeking to have a threesome with two of the hottest women on the planet. Doesn't mean it's gonna happen.

.
 

Corbin

THIS IS MY BOOOOOMSTICK!!
Rams On Demand Sponsor
2023 Sportsbook Champion
Joined
Nov 9, 2014
Messages
11,189
Ram your Ass Stadium presented by PornHub

:yess:
 

RamnSD

Rookie
Joined
Apr 28, 2017
Messages
144
Name
RamnSD
I can't imagine that AT&T would want two stadiums named directly after their company, considering that the Stadium where the Cowgirls play is already AT&T stadium.

Some Ideas:
Farmer's Stadium
Wells Fargo Stadium
Toyota Stadium
Western Digital Stadium
Qualcomm Stadium (Chargers and people in San Diego would certainly see the irony)
DirecTV stadium (an AT&T subsidiary)
Cricket Wireless Stadium (an AT&T subsidiary)
Ingram Micro Stadium (It's a really small stadium, LOL)
 

A.J. Hicks

Hall of Fame
Joined
Aug 12, 2014
Messages
2,564
Name
zoomy
I can't imagine that AT&T would want two stadiums named directly after their company, considering that the Stadium where the Cowgirls play is already AT&T stadium.

Some Ideas:
Farmer's Stadium
Wells Fargo Stadium
Toyota Stadium
Western Digital Stadium
Qualcomm Stadium (Chargers and people in San Diego would certainly see the irony)
DirecTV stadium (an AT&T subsidiary)
Cricket Wireless Stadium (an AT&T subsidiary)
Ingram Micro Stadium (It's a really small stadium, LOL)

Seems like DirecTv would be some kind of wrong in that with them having the exclusive rights to sell NFL ticket
 

Ramrasta

(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻
Joined
Sep 7, 2010
Messages
3,116
Name
Tyler
Would make sense that Walmart would make this move considering the asking price and the connection through Kronke's land development for them.
 

InnovatedMind

NO MA'AM President
Joined
Aug 13, 2016
Messages
1,114
Name
Joe
Seems like DirecTv would be some kind of wrong in that with them having the exclusive rights to sell NFL ticket

Exclusive promo deals for DirectTV users on game tickets / superbowl tickets. I see $$$$$$$$ signs by them attracting a bigger demographic and making sales more manageable.
 

SteezyEndo

The Immaculate Exception
Joined
Sep 16, 2012
Messages
7,116
Thinking a major tech company. Sony, Samsung, hell maybe even EA Sports.
 

Riverumbbq

Angry Progressive
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
May 26, 2013
Messages
11,962
Name
River
Amazon Prime purchased the rights to Thursday night Football, seems having a stadium named after them could be a logical progression. jmo.
 

InnovatedMind

NO MA'AM President
Joined
Aug 13, 2016
Messages
1,114
Name
Joe
Would make sense that Walmart would make this move considering the asking price and the connection through Kronke's land development for them.

Walmart Stadium?


I just got done laughing at some Walmart Memes... oh god... no thank you!
 

Mackeyser

Supernovas are where gold forms; the only place.
Joined
Apr 26, 2013
Messages
14,186
Name
Mack
One of the biggest companies in the world, Chevron, is based out of CA and they have a national reach and no naming rights that I know of.

Farmers, Wells, and Toyota already have naming rights out there, if I'm not mistaken.

Reality is gonna set it and while the deal may set a record, it won't be $600M and even then, it won't be without SERIOUS consideration going back to the company.

Chevron is huge in CA and having that national reach would help. The Big 3 automakers used to standardize all of their high end cars and do all of their testing using Chevron with Techroline, including cars like the Vette and Viper.

Another alternative, literally in the opposite direction would be Tesla.

I dunno if they have the cash, but such an investment would be massive for the fledgling automaker to have their name said so often.
 

Riverumbbq

Angry Progressive
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
May 26, 2013
Messages
11,962
Name
River
Another alternative, literally in the opposite direction would be Tesla.

I dunno if they have the cash, but such an investment would be massive for the fledgling automaker to have their name said so often.

I like it, not just the automotive end with Tesla, also the solar market and the coming wave of high tech battery storage. Seems Elon Musk could afford it, he's reported being a multi-billionaire. Would be truly a singularly California style innovative type corporation, like Tesla, Apple or any number of other Silicon Valley companies. jmo.