Stranger
How big is infinity?
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2010
- Messages
- 7,182
- Name
- Hugh
Yes, you are the first person that I've heard who has totally given up on Bradford. And I simply don't understand it at all. While the personnel dept has made plenty of decisions that I disapproved of, I still can't see how they messed-up on Bradford. I've been watching Ram QB's for 40 years now, and I can't see how anyone would consider Bradford to be anything other than near the top of that list. He's definitely better than Ferragamo, and Vince almost beat the Steelers in a SB. Further, I don't think McD would have come to the Rams as their OC if it were not for Sam and his talent level.HornIt said:interference said:I've never heard this before. Have you argued your position on this somewhere? I'd really like to better understand your insight and your football resume thats led you to your position. I'm open to just about everything right now. But if you're correct, then boy o boy did our player personnel dept F-up and should all be fired.HornIt said:interference said:what, exactly, are you saying about the Bradford experiment?
It was a mistake. Not because Bradford can't be a serviceable QB at some point, but because he's not what they thought/hoped they were getting when they gambled the future of the franchise on him. And when that becomes evident, you shouldn't compound the mistake by letting it result in future mistakes.
Am I really the first person you've heard say gambling the franchise on Bradford was a mistake?
Look at this team. Look at this offense. This is the worst Rams team perhaps ever, and certainly worst offense ever, which is really saying something. I'm honestly not sure how any conclusion other than the personnel dept f'd-up is possible.
Hey, I'm open to opinions right now because of the state of the team, but I'll need real logical support for those opinions if I'm going to seriously consider them.