Worst Trade in Rams History

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.
I dont remember it that way at all. Brooks came in and went with a volume passing attack and then told Bettis he was moving him to fullback. Crazy times, IIRC Rypien ended up with the most yards passing by a Rams QB in their first 3 starts, even thought they got blown out in each game.....
The two things are not mutually exclusive.

Moving him to fullback might have been a legit reason for Bettis to want to dog it and get the hell out of there.

Not blaming Bettis one bit on it.
 
The Bettis trade comes to mind. I can't believe they thought Lawrence fucking Phillips could replace him....
That's true, but in Bettis' last season he just ran with his head down. D lines started just throwing him into the dirt. With that Rams management and coaching staff in place, he wouldn't have been successful staying on here.

Honestly, what coaching staff would just tell you to charge forward with your head down?
 
The Dickerson trade was the one that gets me the most. It was already tough to give up such a generational talent, especially after the Rams finally had a decent QB in Everett to complement him. What they could have done together is more than they ever did separately. The trade of Dickerson could have been salvaged had the Rams hit on some of those high picks, the way the Cowboys did when they sent Herschel Walker to Minnesota. Instead it was bust after bust after bust. Missing on all of those picks was terrible for the franchise, as it reverberated throughout the 1990's with one bad season after another. I can't think of another trade that set the franchise back as much as this one did.
 
How about the trade up to get Tayvon?
The trade up for Tavon was terrible. I wanted them to stand pat and pick Demanded Hopkins. After watching lots of game clips I was convinced that he was the better of the two Clemson receivers. They never had to move to get him.


Wasn't it later in that draft that the Vikings offered them three picks for the Rams late first, but they stood pat and picked Ogletree. I thought it was a mistake. Or was a different draft?
 
  • Like
Reactions: MadGoat
The trade up for Tavon was terrible. I wanted them to stand pat and pick Demanded Hopkins. After watching lots of game clips I was convinced that he was the better of the two Clemson receivers. They never had to move to get him.


Wasn't it later in that draft that the Vikings offered them three picks for the Rams late first, but they stood pat and picked Ogletree. I thought it was a mistake. Or was a different draft?

haha, i was convinced justin hunter was going to be a stud. just looked so smooth running and catching the ball. too bad he didn't have what it took to be a nfl wr. too skinny i think and his body couldn't handle it.

i'm pretty sure the rams traded down to get ogletree.

.
 
I'm going with the Stafford Trade!
 
How about the 2001 trades of Trent Green and Kevin Carter?… with those picks… we got very little.

So much excitement at the time this would feed our Superbowl window.

2001 Rams
The Rams entered this draft with three picks, obtaining the extra first-rounders after sending Trent Green to the Chiefs and defensive end Kevin Carter to the Titans earlier in 2001. The Green deal occurred on draft eve, and it sent the No. 12 overall pick — defensive end Damione Lewis — to St. Louis. The Rams chose safety Adam Archuleta with their own pick, No. 20, and took another defensive lineman — Ryan Pickett — at 29. Pickett became better known for his Packers work and played 14 seasons, while Lewis was a decent Ram for six years. Though Archuleta started in Super Bowl XXXVI, he played just five Rams seasons.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Karate61
Can you imagine if Bettis had the love & dedication of the Rams organization similar to SJAX?
The Bus was not willing to be used as a fullback or wait it out to see how Phillips would work out.
#39, we diehards love you Bro!

1657548692984.png
 
The two things are not mutually exclusive.

Moving him to fullback might have been a legit reason for Bettis to want to dog it and get the hell out of there.

Not blaming Bettis one bit on it.
He planned on moving him to fullback after the 95 season, and then Bettis was traded. I don’t recall him dogging it during the 95 season
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mojo Ram
Can you imagine if Bettis had the love & dedication of the Rams organization similar to SJAX?
The Bus was not willing to be used as a fullback or wait it out to see how Phillips would work out.
#39, we diehards love you Bro!
Wait, what?
Sjax wanted out because he wasn’t going to be the bell cow and wanted to play for a winner.
And off he went to Atlanta for 4 wins while the Rams won 7…..
 
He planned on moving him to fullback after the 95 season, and then Bettis was traded. I don’t recall him dogging it during the 95 season
There was one time where he pulled himself out of a game and wouldn't go back in. There was at least another time where he didn't appear to be giving full effort on a pass block.

IMO he wasn't dogging it; but feuding with his head coach was getting to him and he was distracted and unfocused.
 
Wait, what?
Sjax wanted out because he wasn’t going to be the bell cow and wanted to play for a winner.
And off he went to Atlanta for 4 wins while the Rams won 7…..
Good point Dieterbrock. Sjax was with the Rams 9 years and The Bus only 3. The front office & coach sure gave up on Bettis/allowed the trade when he had so much left in the tank.


1657571712109.png
 
He planned on moving him to fullback after the 95 season, and then Bettis was traded. I don’t recall him dogging it during the 95 season
Look at his stats for 95.

Lowest yardage of his career except for his final year.
Then he goes to Pittsburgh and gets come back player of the year award.

I wasn't in the coaches meetings there or anything but that was the perception by several people around the league.

And to me personally, it didn't look like he was playing very hard compared to his two previous seasons where he won Rookie of the Year, etc.
 
  • Like
Reactions: thirteen28
It probably wasn’t the worst because the rams still did decent but the Goff trade sure cost the Rams a lot and ended up being a poor deal. Just imagine the Rams right now with the ammo we traded for Goff. A few more first round picks (and 2nd/3rd rounders) on this team right now would be pretty awesome.

And before anyone says it— pretty positive the Rams could have gotten Stafford for around the same cost without including Goff in that trade.
 
  • HaHa
  • Not So Sure
Reactions: XXXIVwin and Tano
I'm just glad the Rams are now in the 2+ Superbowl winners club. Been a fan sine 1968 and remember crying after so many heartbreaking playoff losses usually to the cowgirls or viqueens in the 70's then losing to the whiners in the late 80's in the NFCCG.

The demons have been slayed for me. Now I want more titles just because.

Is Stafford conversely the best trade ever? I guess the trade for Marshall Faulk could be up there? I'm from Hawaii and I swear that Faulk was a man among boys when SDSU played against the University of Hawaii back in the day.
 
I'm just glad the Rams are now in the 2+ Superbowl winners club. Been a fan sine 1968 and remember crying after so many heartbreaking playoff losses usually to the cowgirls or viqueens in the 70's then losing to the whiners in the late 80's in the NFCCG.
I still remember the tears (9 years old) after the 1975 NFC Championship Game loss to the Cowboys 37-7 when the Rams finally had Home Field Advantage. Slept like a baby that night though....Woke up every two hours and cried!