Why are the Rams flirting with a Hooker?

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.

Flatlyner

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
2023 ROD Survivor Champion
Joined
Apr 23, 2016
Messages
4,669
Yeah, I'm in the boat of not using any of our premium draft capital to move up, particularly for a guy that (we would all hope) won't take a single snap this season. With as many gaping holes on the roster, this is a formula for us to not be good this season. If we aren't good next season, we are setting for a franchise QB in the draft next year, which would make the pick even worse, I suppose.

I can totally see McVay doing it though.
 

KA210927

Rookie
Joined
Sep 17, 2015
Messages
377
Name
Kevin
Hearing a rumor the Rams maybe trade into the late 1st to grab Hooker. Not sure I like it but I would understand if they are high on him
 

Mackeyser

Supernovas are where gold forms; the only place.
Joined
Apr 26, 2013
Messages
14,448
Name
Mack
Mahomes was viewed as a project too. Andy Reid and Asshole Face saw it differently and turned out to be right.

Think of this too. McVay was hard on Goff for not grasping the offense completely. Hooker scored 64% on the S2 cognitive test. That measure your ability to think fast/ process. I don’t see the fit with McVay. Jaran Hall, on the other hand scored 92%. I’m hoping it’s a smoke screen and not McVay falling in love with a prospect.

I see what you’re saying. A word of caution: the CEO of the S2 testing company said those numbers were false. I don’t think he just meant that 18, either, so I wouldn’t make any judgments based on those numbers. We don’t know what their scores were.
 

jjab360

Legend
Joined
Jan 21, 2013
Messages
6,744
I don't like the blowhards like Kiper but he raises a good point about trading into the bottom of the first for the fifth year option.

If they think Hooker is their guy, I'm down for it. Stafford has at MOST two years left at this point
 

TexasRam

Legend
Joined
Jan 13, 2013
Messages
7,850
Two questions with the Hooker pick though:

1. Next year we should have a top 10 pick due to our depleted roster. Why not pick your QB then?

2. Kupp and Donald window is closing. Do we really want to wait on a QB to develop like Hooker or use the premium picks now to make a run while Kupp/Donald/Stafford are here?
 

ottoman89

Busch Light slammin, hog farmin, Iowa boy.
Joined
Jun 27, 2010
Messages
5,027
Name
Josh Otto
The one and only thing I don't care for is his age.
Two questions with the Hooker pick though:

1. Next year we should have a top 10 pick due to our depleted roster. Why not pick your QB then?

2. Kupp and Donald window is closing. Do we really want to wait on a QB to develop like Hooker or use the premium picks now to make a run while Kupp/Donald/Stafford are here?
I think the window is closed with the construction of the roster currently. If they really like Hooker, jumpstart a fresh start by getting him now.
 

Elmgrovegnome

Legend
Joined
Jan 23, 2013
Messages
22,775
If we moved up for Hooker, I'd trust McVay. I like Hooker. I think given time to adjust to a NFL system, he can be a quality QB.
I agree. If it saves the Rams from being in QB purgatory for ten years after Stafford retires, then it’s worth trading up.

I expect Seattle may take him with their second first round pick.
 

I like Rams

Hall of Fame
Joined
Aug 15, 2017
Messages
2,258
Two questions with the Hooker pick though:

1. Next year we should have a top 10 pick due to our depleted roster. Why not pick your QB then?

2. Kupp and Donald window is closing. Do we really want to wait on a QB to develop like Hooker or use the premium picks now to make a run while Kupp/Donald/Stafford are here?
I think if they do move up and grab Hooker, that shows they really want him to sit behind Staff for a season and learn from him and really digest the system and start next year. Which I get. It's either that or possibly rely on a rookie qb to be your starter next season.

I think if they do grab a qb tonight, it shows hiw confident they are in Staff staying around for more than this season.
 

CGI_Ram

Hamburger Connoisseur
Moderator
Joined
Jun 28, 2010
Messages
49,214
Name
Burger man
Yeah, I could get onboard with Hooker, if the Rams are.

He has an NFL arm.
 

dieterbrock

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jan 3, 2013
Messages
24,041
I'm almost at the point that I'll be disappointed if they dont move up and draft him in 1st round
 

Elmgrovegnome

Legend
Joined
Jan 23, 2013
Messages
22,775
I see what you’re saying. A word of caution: the CEO of the S2 testing company said those numbers were false. I don’t think he just meant that 18, either, so I wouldn’t make any judgments based on those numbers. We don’t know what their scores were.
He said some of them were false. I saw it as a PR move. He’s covering his butt imo. He also made it sound like Stroud just didn’t want to take the test and was tired and miserable, without naming him.

My guess is they were accurate.
 

Merlin

Damn the torpedoes
Rams On Demand Sponsor
ROD Credit | 2023 TOP Member
Joined
May 8, 2014
Messages
39,681
I see what you’re saying. A word of caution: the CEO of the S2 testing company said those numbers were false. I don’t think he just meant that 18, either, so I wouldn’t make any judgments based on those numbers. We don’t know what their scores were.
Concern I'd have with Stroud is his general give-a-fuck. He doesn't care about the Mannings or what they think. Doesn't care about the S2 test. The guy is immensely talented but time has demonstrated that talent alone is not enough at QB at this level. Is he gonna do the work?

Think I'd pass on him. He reminds me of some kid who just got asked to do chores and is disgusted by the thought.
 

KA210927

Rookie
Joined
Sep 17, 2015
Messages
377
Name
Kevin
The one and only thing I don't care for is his age.

I think the window is closed with the construction of the roster currently. If they really like Hooker, jumpstart a fresh start by getting him now.
That is the big question. Have they closed to door? Or will they try something next year for AD/Staffords last push?